PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TALKING STICK TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERFIKIR KREATIF MATEMATIKA SISWA DI SMP NEGERI 11 PADANGSIDIMPUAN

Haritsah Hammamah Harahap, A. Panjaitan
{"title":"PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TALKING STICK TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERFIKIR KREATIF MATEMATIKA SISWA DI SMP NEGERI 11 PADANGSIDIMPUAN","authors":"Haritsah Hammamah Harahap, A. Panjaitan","doi":"10.31604/eksakta.v4i1.10-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is a research experiment, with the entire population of students of class VIII SMP Negeri 11 Padangsidimpuan which consists of 3 classes. Sampling in this research is done by using the technique of cluster sample, which of the engineering cluster sample. Data analysis techniques include test normality, test its homogeneity and test hypotheses. Hypothesis testing is carried out by two roads at anava extent confidence α = 0.05. The results of the analysis on two path with cell anava not same retrieved F_a = F_tabel =18,51 with 1,079. Furthermore the research results obtained from the average of 78.00 experiment class while the average classroom control now and results at 71.96 class experiment 4.15 while 3.48 control class. The descriptive data analysis used in the observation activities of the students and the students answer patterns.   Observation results acquired the levels of activity of the students in the class of experiment of 75.81% with good qualifications while at 67.81% control classes with qualified enough. As for the pattern of experimental  class  students  answer  better  than  the  class  of  the  control.  Based  on  the research results, it is recommended to apply the cooperative learning model type of the talking stick. Keywords: the talking stick, creative thinking, research experiment","PeriodicalId":165009,"journal":{"name":"EKSAKTA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran MIPA","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EKSAKTA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran MIPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31604/eksakta.v4i1.10-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is a research experiment, with the entire population of students of class VIII SMP Negeri 11 Padangsidimpuan which consists of 3 classes. Sampling in this research is done by using the technique of cluster sample, which of the engineering cluster sample. Data analysis techniques include test normality, test its homogeneity and test hypotheses. Hypothesis testing is carried out by two roads at anava extent confidence α = 0.05. The results of the analysis on two path with cell anava not same retrieved F_a = F_tabel =18,51 with 1,079. Furthermore the research results obtained from the average of 78.00 experiment class while the average classroom control now and results at 71.96 class experiment 4.15 while 3.48 control class. The descriptive data analysis used in the observation activities of the students and the students answer patterns.   Observation results acquired the levels of activity of the students in the class of experiment of 75.81% with good qualifications while at 67.81% control classes with qualified enough. As for the pattern of experimental  class  students  answer  better  than  the  class  of  the  control.  Based  on  the research results, it is recommended to apply the cooperative learning model type of the talking stick. Keywords: the talking stick, creative thinking, research experiment
《合作性学习模式对话型》应用于11年级学生的创造性数学思考能力
本研究是一项研究性实验,研究对象为SMP Negeri 11 Padangsidimpuan八班的全部学生,共分为3个班。本研究采用工程类样本的聚类样本技术进行抽样。数据分析技术包括检验正态性、检验同质性和检验假设。采用两条路进行假设检验,置信度α = 0.05。对两个路径的分析结果与细胞anava不相同检索到F_a = F_tabel =18,51与1,079。进一步的研究结果得出实验班的平均成绩为78.00而对照班的平均成绩为71.96而对照班的平均成绩为4.15而对照班的平均成绩为3.48。描述性数据分析用于观察学生的活动和学生的回答模式。观察结果:实验班学生的活动水平为75.81%,素质较好;控制班学生的活动水平为67.81%,素质较好。在模式上实验班学生的回答要优于控制班。在研究结果的基础上,建议采用合作学习模式类型的说话棒。关键词:说话棒,创造性思维,研究性实验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信