Brushed under the carpet: Examining the complexities of participatory research

Caroline Lennette, Sarah Banks, K. Coddington, Tina Cook, Sui-Ting Kong, C. Nunn, Nelli Stavropoulou
{"title":"Brushed under the carpet: Examining the complexities of participatory research","authors":"Caroline Lennette, Sarah Banks, K. Coddington, Tina Cook, Sui-Ting Kong, C. Nunn, Nelli Stavropoulou","doi":"10.18546/RFA.03.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participatory research is sometimes difficult and risky, but there is a paucity of opportunities – and some reluctance – to reflect on its challenging aspects. In this article, we present subjective accounts of our everyday experiences of conducting participatory research\n as women researchers. We focus on four themes from our combined research experiences to explore some of the frustrations we encounter in participatory research. We argue that it is crucial to identify, reflect upon and address such aspects in academic outputs to broaden debates and scholarly\n discussions. We offer these reflections, and related strategies, as a contribution to critical debates on participatory research practice.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research for All","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18546/RFA.03.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

Participatory research is sometimes difficult and risky, but there is a paucity of opportunities – and some reluctance – to reflect on its challenging aspects. In this article, we present subjective accounts of our everyday experiences of conducting participatory research as women researchers. We focus on four themes from our combined research experiences to explore some of the frustrations we encounter in participatory research. We argue that it is crucial to identify, reflect upon and address such aspects in academic outputs to broaden debates and scholarly discussions. We offer these reflections, and related strategies, as a contribution to critical debates on participatory research practice.
被掩盖:审视参与式研究的复杂性
参与性研究有时是困难和有风险的,但是很少有机会——而且有些人不愿意——去反思它的挑战性方面。在这篇文章中,我们提出了我们的日常经验进行参与性研究作为女性研究人员的主观帐户。我们将从我们的综合研究经验中关注四个主题,以探索我们在参与式研究中遇到的一些挫折。我们认为,在学术产出中识别、反思和解决这些方面对于扩大辩论和学术讨论至关重要。我们提供这些反思和相关策略,作为对参与性研究实践的批判性辩论的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信