LITERATURE AS A SCHOOL DISCIPLINE: FROM “SUBJECT-SUBJECT” TO ANTHROPOLOGICAL APPROACH

M. Pavlovets
{"title":"LITERATURE AS A SCHOOL DISCIPLINE: FROM “SUBJECT-SUBJECT” TO ANTHROPOLOGICAL APPROACH","authors":"M. Pavlovets","doi":"10.18522/2415-8852-2021-4-64-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on some recent approaches to teaching literature as a school discipline, that arise to “reconstruct” it on a new ground in response to the general awareness of crisis in this area. Special attention is paid to the concept of “subject-to-subject reading method” formulated by a widely known expert on F.M. Dostoevsky’s work, doctor of Philology Tatyana Kasatkina. In this article we conclude that this method is hardly applicable for public schools, as it proposes conflict of a first reading experience and a research-based “re-reading” with a priority of the latter. This approach lets the image of reader’s life experience fade in the process of comprehension of the text for the sake of cognizing the subjectivity of the author. However, being relevant for a professional philological research, the method depreciates the role of readers’ subjective comprehension and interpretation of the text and may even discourage reading motivation of pupils, who do not look forward to getting a philological education, but for whom the free time reading and communication, based on the texts they read, may become one of the most significant life priorities.","PeriodicalId":318261,"journal":{"name":"Practices & Interpretations: A Journal of Philology, Teaching and Cultural Studies","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practices & Interpretations: A Journal of Philology, Teaching and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18522/2415-8852-2021-4-64-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article focuses on some recent approaches to teaching literature as a school discipline, that arise to “reconstruct” it on a new ground in response to the general awareness of crisis in this area. Special attention is paid to the concept of “subject-to-subject reading method” formulated by a widely known expert on F.M. Dostoevsky’s work, doctor of Philology Tatyana Kasatkina. In this article we conclude that this method is hardly applicable for public schools, as it proposes conflict of a first reading experience and a research-based “re-reading” with a priority of the latter. This approach lets the image of reader’s life experience fade in the process of comprehension of the text for the sake of cognizing the subjectivity of the author. However, being relevant for a professional philological research, the method depreciates the role of readers’ subjective comprehension and interpretation of the text and may even discourage reading motivation of pupils, who do not look forward to getting a philological education, but for whom the free time reading and communication, based on the texts they read, may become one of the most significant life priorities.
文学作为一门学校学科:从“主体-主体”到人类学研究
本文重点介绍了近年来学校文学教学的一些方法,这些方法是为了在新的基础上“重建”文学,以应对这一领域的普遍危机意识。本书特别关注由著名的陀思妥耶夫斯基研究专家、语言学博士Tatyana Kasatkina提出的“主体对主体阅读法”的概念。在本文中,我们得出结论,这种方法很难适用于公立学校,因为它提出了第一次阅读体验和基于研究的“重读”的冲突,后者是优先考虑的。这种方式使读者的生活经历形象在理解文本的过程中淡化,从而使读者认识到作者的主体性。然而,与专业的文献学研究相关,这种方法低估了读者对文本的主观理解和解释的作用,甚至可能降低学生的阅读动机,他们并不期待接受文献学教育,但对他们来说,空闲时间的阅读和交流,基于他们阅读的文本,可能成为最重要的生活优先事项之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信