Patterns of responses to COVID-19 in selected Latin American countries

T. Peres, Adalberto Cardoso
{"title":"Patterns of responses to COVID-19 in selected Latin American countries","authors":"T. Peres, Adalberto Cardoso","doi":"10.11606/issn.1676-6288.prolam.2021.186394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses structural and context constraints and opportunities faced by Latin America in the battle against the Covid-19 pandemic. We argue that the number of deaths (and related statistics, such as number of infected or number of tests) as a proportion of the countries’ populations is an important but insufficient measure of the effectiveness of each country’s responses to the SARS-CoV-2. We test the correlation of deaths with typical structural constraints (Gross domestic product, United Nation – Human Development Index, Gini index, expenditure in health, children’s mortality rate, informality rate), and find that between countries’ differences in these measures do not help to understand the number of deaths per million inhabitants. We then move to a more in-depth analysis of 11 selected Latin American countries to show that those that chose collective responsibility (a notion developed in the article) in the management of the responses to the crisis, and that could coordinate the actions of different governing levels, fared much better than those that chose individual responsibility and low levels of coordination, irrespective of existing structural constraints.","PeriodicalId":194052,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos Prolam/USP","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos Prolam/USP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1676-6288.prolam.2021.186394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article analyses structural and context constraints and opportunities faced by Latin America in the battle against the Covid-19 pandemic. We argue that the number of deaths (and related statistics, such as number of infected or number of tests) as a proportion of the countries’ populations is an important but insufficient measure of the effectiveness of each country’s responses to the SARS-CoV-2. We test the correlation of deaths with typical structural constraints (Gross domestic product, United Nation – Human Development Index, Gini index, expenditure in health, children’s mortality rate, informality rate), and find that between countries’ differences in these measures do not help to understand the number of deaths per million inhabitants. We then move to a more in-depth analysis of 11 selected Latin American countries to show that those that chose collective responsibility (a notion developed in the article) in the management of the responses to the crisis, and that could coordinate the actions of different governing levels, fared much better than those that chose individual responsibility and low levels of coordination, irrespective of existing structural constraints.
部分拉丁美洲国家应对COVID-19的模式
本文分析了拉丁美洲在抗击Covid-19大流行中面临的结构性和背景限制和机遇。我们认为,死亡人数(以及相关统计数据,如感染人数或检测次数)占各国人口的比例是衡量每个国家应对SARS-CoV-2有效性的重要但不充分的指标。我们测试了死亡与典型结构性限制因素(国内生产总值、联合国人类发展指数、基尼指数、卫生支出、儿童死亡率、非正规率)之间的相关性,发现各国在这些措施上的差异无助于了解每百万居民的死亡人数。然后,我们对11个选定的拉丁美洲国家进行了更深入的分析,以表明那些在应对危机的管理中选择集体责任(本文中提出的一个概念),并且可以协调不同治理层面的行动的国家,比那些选择个人责任和低水平协调的国家表现得更好,而不考虑现有的结构性约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信