Secure database design panel

T. Hinke
{"title":"Secure database design panel","authors":"T. Hinke","doi":"10.1109/CSAC.1989.81070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is shown that tuple-level mandatory protection and relation-level discretionary protection are adequate for supporting the security requirements of the RADC (Rome Air Development Center) homework problem, a 22-page specification for a multilevel secure database. The tuple-level granularity of control induced database decomposition to provide tuples of uniform classification. Likewise, the discretionary protection on relations induced database decomposition to meet the discretionary requirements. While there were a few examples in which tuple-level discretionary controls would have been desirable, this slight inconvenience is balanced by the lower overhead of relation level discretionary controls.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":284420,"journal":{"name":"[1989 Proceedings] Fifth Annual Computer Security Applications Conference","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989 Proceedings] Fifth Annual Computer Security Applications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSAC.1989.81070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is shown that tuple-level mandatory protection and relation-level discretionary protection are adequate for supporting the security requirements of the RADC (Rome Air Development Center) homework problem, a 22-page specification for a multilevel secure database. The tuple-level granularity of control induced database decomposition to provide tuples of uniform classification. Likewise, the discretionary protection on relations induced database decomposition to meet the discretionary requirements. While there were a few examples in which tuple-level discretionary controls would have been desirable, this slight inconvenience is balanced by the lower overhead of relation level discretionary controls.<>
安全数据库设计面板
结果表明,双层强制保护和关系级酌情保护足以支持RADC(罗马航空发展中心)作业问题的安全要求,这是一个22页的多级安全数据库规范。元组级粒度的控制诱导数据库分解,以提供统一分类的元组。同样,对关系的自由裁量保护导致数据库分解以满足自由裁量需求。虽然在一些例子中,双级自由裁量控制是可取的,但这种轻微的不便被关系级自由裁量控制的较低开销所平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信