Passivity Verification and Macromodel Interpolation Using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)

D. Elgamel, Roy Greeff, David Ovard
{"title":"Passivity Verification and Macromodel Interpolation Using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)","authors":"D. Elgamel, Roy Greeff, David Ovard","doi":"10.1109/WMED.2015.7093692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximation of the Rational Function (RF) order plays a key role in passivity checking of large interconnect memory design. RF approximation can be estimated using the Least- square solutions; the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) is used to solve large order macromodels. The interpolation method is used to solve linear systems by approximating the RF degree and coefficients. However, building the macromodel requires RF order approximation, which can lead to inaccurate passivity checking for complex systems. While inaccurate order estimation may lead to inaccuracy in the passivity checking process and drive to unnecessary passivity enforcement to the macromodel. Inaccurate passivity enforcement perturbation may cause large error adds up to the RF approximation, and may change the original design characteristics. Thus, passivity verification for larger order models requires determining the RF order, using the SVD resolved the inaccurate prior estimation of the model order, yet it yields to an exact solution. SVD is considered an expensive computational algorithm, but SVD shows accurate models order approximation. Using the SVD solved the problem associated with the passivity checking algorithm, which is estimating the initial number of poles or the model order. However, the correlation between determining the model order degree and passivity checking did not exist before. The DC frequency band and the truncation frequency point may lead to some residuals that affect the accuracy of this estimation. Using SVD to solve linear systems enhances the passivity checking of DRAM memory package and high end computers reduces the computation time.","PeriodicalId":251088,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Workshop on Microelectronics and Electron Devices (WMED)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Workshop on Microelectronics and Electron Devices (WMED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WMED.2015.7093692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximation of the Rational Function (RF) order plays a key role in passivity checking of large interconnect memory design. RF approximation can be estimated using the Least- square solutions; the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) is used to solve large order macromodels. The interpolation method is used to solve linear systems by approximating the RF degree and coefficients. However, building the macromodel requires RF order approximation, which can lead to inaccurate passivity checking for complex systems. While inaccurate order estimation may lead to inaccuracy in the passivity checking process and drive to unnecessary passivity enforcement to the macromodel. Inaccurate passivity enforcement perturbation may cause large error adds up to the RF approximation, and may change the original design characteristics. Thus, passivity verification for larger order models requires determining the RF order, using the SVD resolved the inaccurate prior estimation of the model order, yet it yields to an exact solution. SVD is considered an expensive computational algorithm, but SVD shows accurate models order approximation. Using the SVD solved the problem associated with the passivity checking algorithm, which is estimating the initial number of poles or the model order. However, the correlation between determining the model order degree and passivity checking did not exist before. The DC frequency band and the truncation frequency point may lead to some residuals that affect the accuracy of this estimation. Using SVD to solve linear systems enhances the passivity checking of DRAM memory package and high end computers reduces the computation time.
基于奇异值分解(SVD)的无源性验证与宏模型插值
在大型互连存储器设计的无源性检测中,有理函数(RF)阶数的逼近起着关键作用。射频近似可以用最小二乘解估计;采用奇异值分解(SVD)方法求解大阶宏观模型。该插值方法通过近似射频度和系数来求解线性系统。然而,构建宏模型需要RF阶近似,这可能导致复杂系统的无源检查不准确。而不准确的顺序估计可能导致被动检查过程的不准确性,并导致不必要的对宏模型的被动执行。不准确的无源强制摄动会导致RF近似的大误差,并可能改变原设计特性。因此,大阶模型的无源验证需要确定RF阶数,使用SVD解决了先前对模型阶数的不准确估计,但它产生了精确的解决方案。奇异值分解被认为是一种昂贵的计算算法,但奇异值分解显示出精确的模型阶近似。利用奇异值分解解决了无源性检测算法中初始极点数或模型阶数的估计问题。然而,在此之前,模型有序度的确定与被动检验之间并不存在相关性。直流频带和截断频率点可能会产生一些残差,影响估计的准确性。采用奇异值分解方法求解线性系统,增强了DRAM内存封装的无源性检测能力,并减少了高端计算机的计算时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信