Tham Luong Thi Thu, Yen Nguyen Hoang Phuong, Quyen Le Nhat, Thuy Tran Thi Phuong, Hoa Tran Thi, Thao Vo Thi, Hai Nguyen Thi Hong, Tam Tran Thi Quynh, Dan Nguyen Duc, Dan Ho Thi Linh, Hieu Ho, Khanh Nguyen Phi, Vinh Vo Van Quang, Lieu Dinh Thi, Khuyen Nguyen Ngo Bao, Dan Chau Nguyen, Nha Dang Thi Thanh, Anh Hoang Tuan, Phuong Ha Minh, Minh Nguyen Hoang, Thang Phan Van, Duong Le Dinh, Thang Tran Binh, Tu Nguyen Minh, Gia Nguyen Thanh
{"title":"Academic stress and related factors among medical students of Hue university of Medicine andPharmacy","authors":"Tham Luong Thi Thu, Yen Nguyen Hoang Phuong, Quyen Le Nhat, Thuy Tran Thi Phuong, Hoa Tran Thi, Thao Vo Thi, Hai Nguyen Thi Hong, Tam Tran Thi Quynh, Dan Nguyen Duc, Dan Ho Thi Linh, Hieu Ho, Khanh Nguyen Phi, Vinh Vo Van Quang, Lieu Dinh Thi, Khuyen Nguyen Ngo Bao, Dan Chau Nguyen, Nha Dang Thi Thanh, Anh Hoang Tuan, Phuong Ha Minh, Minh Nguyen Hoang, Thang Phan Van, Duong Le Dinh, Thang Tran Binh, Tu Nguyen Minh, Gia Nguyen Thanh","doi":"10.53522/ytcc.vi60.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To identify the prevalence of academic pressure and to analyze relatedfactorsamongmedical students of Hue university of Medicine and Pharmacy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 878 medical students usingtheEducationalStress Scale for Adolescents (ESSA). Result: The prevalence of academic pressure among students was 59.3%. Factors relatedtoacademic pressure wererst-year students with OR = 1.60; third-year students with R .88; ood or excellent ranking with OR = 0.71; average or weak or poor ranking with R .19; onthly allowance from 1.5 to under 2.3 million Dong with OR = 1.57; not participating n ports r exercise with OR = 1.52; not satised with the health with OR = 1.86; not satised ith ocial elationships with OR = 1.79; reasons for choosing theeld study due to orientation o parents th OR = 1.83; unsatised with the quality of lecturers with OR = 143; and usatised wth iversity administration with OR = 0.61. Conclusion: Students should be provided with the appropriate coping strategies for aademic essure and encouraged to participate in exercise and sports.","PeriodicalId":170809,"journal":{"name":"Tạp chí Y tế Công cộng","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tạp chí Y tế Công cộng","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53522/ytcc.vi60.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To identify the prevalence of academic pressure and to analyze relatedfactorsamongmedical students of Hue university of Medicine and Pharmacy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 878 medical students usingtheEducationalStress Scale for Adolescents (ESSA). Result: The prevalence of academic pressure among students was 59.3%. Factors relatedtoacademic pressure wererst-year students with OR = 1.60; third-year students with R .88; ood or excellent ranking with OR = 0.71; average or weak or poor ranking with R .19; onthly allowance from 1.5 to under 2.3 million Dong with OR = 1.57; not participating n ports r exercise with OR = 1.52; not satised with the health with OR = 1.86; not satised ith ocial elationships with OR = 1.79; reasons for choosing theeld study due to orientation o parents th OR = 1.83; unsatised with the quality of lecturers with OR = 143; and usatised wth iversity administration with OR = 0.61. Conclusion: Students should be provided with the appropriate coping strategies for aademic essure and encouraged to participate in exercise and sports.