Understanding the Factors at Play in the Sender-Receiver Dynamic During the Telepathy Ganzfeld

Abby Pooley, A. Murray, Caroline Watt
{"title":"Understanding the Factors at Play in the Sender-Receiver Dynamic During the Telepathy Ganzfeld","authors":"Abby Pooley, A. Murray, Caroline Watt","doi":"10.31156/jaex.23878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To use meta-analysis to explore five previously uninvestigated factors related to the sender-receiver dynamic in the telepathy ganzfeld. The five factors of interest are: a) did the receiver see the sender’s room prior to the session?; b) could the sender hear the receiver during the mentation period?; c) could the sender hear the receiver during the judging period?; d) was the sender explicitly told to be silent?; and e) did the experimenter assist in the review section of the session? Method: Telepathy ganzfeld studies conducted post Joint Communiqué, with one session per day and the receivers rating the targets, were chosen. Two mixed-effects models were fit: 1) using the study hit rates as the binomial mean; and 2) using the study hit rates as a proportion. Both models have the five factors as binary moderators. Results: Both the binomial mean and proportion models suggest a significant effect of the moderators overall and two factors individually: 1) the sender being able to hear the receiver during the mentation period; and 2) a review period after the mentation period. Permutation tests for both models also show significant effects of the moderators and the two factors. Conclusion: The sender being able to hear the receiver’s mentation appears to increase overall study success, while the review period decreases overall study success","PeriodicalId":242256,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31156/jaex.23878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To use meta-analysis to explore five previously uninvestigated factors related to the sender-receiver dynamic in the telepathy ganzfeld. The five factors of interest are: a) did the receiver see the sender’s room prior to the session?; b) could the sender hear the receiver during the mentation period?; c) could the sender hear the receiver during the judging period?; d) was the sender explicitly told to be silent?; and e) did the experimenter assist in the review section of the session? Method: Telepathy ganzfeld studies conducted post Joint Communiqué, with one session per day and the receivers rating the targets, were chosen. Two mixed-effects models were fit: 1) using the study hit rates as the binomial mean; and 2) using the study hit rates as a proportion. Both models have the five factors as binary moderators. Results: Both the binomial mean and proportion models suggest a significant effect of the moderators overall and two factors individually: 1) the sender being able to hear the receiver during the mentation period; and 2) a review period after the mentation period. Permutation tests for both models also show significant effects of the moderators and the two factors. Conclusion: The sender being able to hear the receiver’s mentation appears to increase overall study success, while the review period decreases overall study success
理解心灵感应过程中发送者-接收者动态的影响因素
目标。运用荟萃分析方法探讨ganzfeld心灵感应中与发送者-接收者动态相关的五个先前未被研究的因素。五个感兴趣的因素是:a)在会议之前,接收者是否看到了发送者的房间?B)在心理状态期间,发送者能听到接收者的声音吗?C)在评判期间,发送者能听到接收者的声音吗?D)发件人被明确告知要保持沉默吗?e)实验者是否在会议的回顾部分提供帮助?方法:在联合公报发布后进行心灵感应甘兹菲尔德研究,每天一次,接受者对目标进行评级。拟合两种混合效应模型:1)以研究命中率作为二项均值;2)使用研究命中率作为比例。这两个模型都有五个因素作为二元调节因子。结果:二项均值模型和比例模型均表明,调节者对心理状态的总体影响显著,并分别受到两个因素的影响:1)发送者在心理状态期间能够听到接收者的声音;2)审评期后的审评期。对两个模型的置换检验也显示了调节因子和两个因素的显著影响。结论:发送者能够听到接收者的心理状态似乎增加了整体学习的成功,而审查时间则降低了整体学习的成功
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信