The Western Balkans: The EU Border Outsourcing Process and Its Impact on the Balkan Region

Ruth Ferrero-Turrión
{"title":"The Western Balkans: The EU Border Outsourcing Process and Its Impact on the Balkan Region","authors":"Ruth Ferrero-Turrión","doi":"10.18485/iipe_balkans_rssc.2020.ch6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": During the so-called refugee crisis of 2015 and 2016, the European Union launched a strategy to contain migration flows based on three main pillars: securitization, externalization and criminalization of help. In this paper, we will focus on the externalization or border outsourcing to third countries, particularly towards the Western Balkans. The implementation of the Action Plan approved by the EU and the countries of the region, together with different reforms on the asylum and refugees’ rules and regulations in some EU countries, as well as the enlargement of the Safe Countries list towards the Western Balkans countries and Turkey, has had an impact in the region. Issues such as how the humanitarian crisis has impacted the Western Balkans countries or changes in the conditionality demands towards these countries based on cooperation on the outsourcing process will be addressed. Our main point of departure is that more attention towards this region has been paid by the EU due to the so-called refugee crisis, and the commitments agreed among Brussels and the Western Balkans countries to deal with it have had more importance to the EU than the progress achieved by these countries. On the other hand, we will state that the Western Balkans have been used as a buffer to contain migration flows under the excuse of the conditionality principle. Both facts have had an impact on the region in two main aspects. The first one, is related to the human mobility of Balkan citizens towards the EU countries, with or without visa liberalization. Second, by affecting regional cooperation and trust among these countries and other Balkans countries already in the EU. Our main conclusion is that the security and stability strategy implemented by the EU in the Western Balkans countries has led to a backstop in the democratic reforms of these countries, together with a loss of influence and presence perception of the EU in the region in favor of other actors less demanding in terms of protection of the rule of law, pluralism or democratization.","PeriodicalId":139511,"journal":{"name":"Security Challenges and the Place of the Balkans and Serbia","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security Challenges and the Place of the Balkans and Serbia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/iipe_balkans_rssc.2020.ch6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: During the so-called refugee crisis of 2015 and 2016, the European Union launched a strategy to contain migration flows based on three main pillars: securitization, externalization and criminalization of help. In this paper, we will focus on the externalization or border outsourcing to third countries, particularly towards the Western Balkans. The implementation of the Action Plan approved by the EU and the countries of the region, together with different reforms on the asylum and refugees’ rules and regulations in some EU countries, as well as the enlargement of the Safe Countries list towards the Western Balkans countries and Turkey, has had an impact in the region. Issues such as how the humanitarian crisis has impacted the Western Balkans countries or changes in the conditionality demands towards these countries based on cooperation on the outsourcing process will be addressed. Our main point of departure is that more attention towards this region has been paid by the EU due to the so-called refugee crisis, and the commitments agreed among Brussels and the Western Balkans countries to deal with it have had more importance to the EU than the progress achieved by these countries. On the other hand, we will state that the Western Balkans have been used as a buffer to contain migration flows under the excuse of the conditionality principle. Both facts have had an impact on the region in two main aspects. The first one, is related to the human mobility of Balkan citizens towards the EU countries, with or without visa liberalization. Second, by affecting regional cooperation and trust among these countries and other Balkans countries already in the EU. Our main conclusion is that the security and stability strategy implemented by the EU in the Western Balkans countries has led to a backstop in the democratic reforms of these countries, together with a loss of influence and presence perception of the EU in the region in favor of other actors less demanding in terms of protection of the rule of law, pluralism or democratization.
西巴尔干:欧盟边境外包过程及其对巴尔干地区的影响
在2015年和2016年所谓的难民危机期间,欧盟启动了一项基于三大支柱的遏制移民流动战略:援助的证券化、外部化和刑事化。在本文中,我们将重点关注外部化或边境外包到第三国,特别是对西巴尔干。欧盟和本地区国家批准的《行动计划》的实施,以及一些欧盟国家对庇护和难民法规的不同改革,以及安全国家名单向西巴尔干国家和土耳其的扩大,对本地区产生了影响。将讨论诸如人道主义危机如何影响西巴尔干国家或根据外包过程的合作对这些国家提出的条件要求的变化等问题。我们的主要出发点是,由于所谓的难民危机,欧盟对该地区给予了更多的关注,布鲁塞尔和西巴尔干国家之间达成的应对难民危机的承诺对欧盟来说比这些国家取得的进展更重要。另一方面,我们要指出,西巴尔干已被利用为以条件原则为借口限制移徙流动的缓冲区。这两个事实在两个主要方面对该地区产生了影响。第一个是关于巴尔干半岛公民向欧盟国家的人口流动,无论是否实行签证自由化。第二,影响这些国家与其他已加入欧盟的巴尔干国家之间的区域合作与信任。我们的主要结论是,欧盟在西巴尔干国家实施的安全和稳定战略阻碍了这些国家的民主改革,同时欧盟在该地区的影响力和存在感的丧失,有利于其他在保护法治、多元化或民主化方面要求较低的行为体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信