Dissociating compulsive washing and hoarding tendencies through differences in comorbidities and the content of concerns

IF 1.7 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Tingting Liu, Joshua M. Ackerman, Stephanie D. Preston
{"title":"Dissociating compulsive washing and hoarding tendencies through differences in comorbidities and the content of concerns","authors":"Tingting Liu,&nbsp;Joshua M. Ackerman,&nbsp;Stephanie D. Preston","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2021.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Clinical compulsive washing and hoarding are intercorrelated and share comorbidities even though they are distinct and appear to manifest through opposing extremes of cleanliness and disorder (respectively). We attempted to resolve this paradox by testing five hypotheses in online, non-clinical samples (<em>N</em><sub><em>study</em></sub> <sub><em>1</em></sub> <!-->=<!--> <!-->123, <em>N</em><sub><em>study</em></sub> <sub><em>2</em></sub> <!-->=<!--> <!-->177, <em>N</em><sub><em>study</em></sub> <sub><em>3</em></sub> <!-->=<!--> <!-->217). We replicated the intercorrelation of washing and hoarding tendencies in all studies, despite observing non-clinical individual differences. Both washing and hoarding were associated with anxiety, depression, and fears of social rejection and failure, but they were also distinguishable. Compulsive washing was associated with greater anxiety, disgust, perceptions of infection vulnerability, and the desire to organize a cluttered space, whereas hoarding was associated with reduced concerns about germs and full or cluttered spaces and higher concerns about assault, threats to safety, and insects. A third study tested and confirmed the hypothesis that washing and hoarding may be related because they are adaptive in combination during stressful conditions, like a global pandemic. During COVID-19, washing and hoarding tendencies were even more strongly interrelated, and disease-avoidant behaviors like wearing a mask and avoiding people increased with washing tendencies but decreased with hoarding tendencies. Overlapping psychopathological states can be distinguished even in non-clinical samples through psychopathological profiles and the content of concerns—that shift with one's context. Treatment may benefit from not only working to cease undesirable behaviors but also from ameliorating root fears and anxieties that are dissociable by condition and individual but not always linked to the behavioral expression.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"31 4","pages":"Pages 291-308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979121000287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Clinical compulsive washing and hoarding are intercorrelated and share comorbidities even though they are distinct and appear to manifest through opposing extremes of cleanliness and disorder (respectively). We attempted to resolve this paradox by testing five hypotheses in online, non-clinical samples (Nstudy 1 = 123, Nstudy 2 = 177, Nstudy 3 = 217). We replicated the intercorrelation of washing and hoarding tendencies in all studies, despite observing non-clinical individual differences. Both washing and hoarding were associated with anxiety, depression, and fears of social rejection and failure, but they were also distinguishable. Compulsive washing was associated with greater anxiety, disgust, perceptions of infection vulnerability, and the desire to organize a cluttered space, whereas hoarding was associated with reduced concerns about germs and full or cluttered spaces and higher concerns about assault, threats to safety, and insects. A third study tested and confirmed the hypothesis that washing and hoarding may be related because they are adaptive in combination during stressful conditions, like a global pandemic. During COVID-19, washing and hoarding tendencies were even more strongly interrelated, and disease-avoidant behaviors like wearing a mask and avoiding people increased with washing tendencies but decreased with hoarding tendencies. Overlapping psychopathological states can be distinguished even in non-clinical samples through psychopathological profiles and the content of concerns—that shift with one's context. Treatment may benefit from not only working to cease undesirable behaviors but also from ameliorating root fears and anxieties that are dissociable by condition and individual but not always linked to the behavioral expression.

通过合并症和关注内容的差异分离强迫性洗涤和囤积倾向
临床强迫性洗涤和囤积是相互关联的,尽管它们是截然不同的,似乎表现为清洁和混乱的对立极端(分别),但它们有共同的合并症。我们试图通过在线非临床样本(Nstudy 1 = 123, Nstudy 2 = 177, Nstudy 3 = 217)检验五个假设来解决这一悖论。尽管观察到非临床个体差异,我们在所有研究中重复了洗涤和囤积倾向的相互关系。洗衣服和囤积都与焦虑、抑郁、害怕社会排斥和失败有关,但它们也是可区分的。强迫性洗涤与更大的焦虑、厌恶、易受感染的感觉以及整理杂乱空间的愿望有关,而囤积与减少对细菌和满或杂乱空间的担忧有关,而与对攻击、安全威胁和昆虫的更高担忧有关。第三项研究测试并证实了洗衣和囤积可能相关的假设,因为它们在压力条件下(如全球大流行)具有适应性。在COVID-19期间,洗涤和囤积倾向之间的相关性更加强烈,戴口罩和躲避人等疾病回避行为随着洗涤倾向的增加而增加,但随着囤积倾向的减少而减少。即使在非临床样本中,重叠的精神病理状态也可以通过精神病理概况和关注的内容来区分-随着一个人的背景而变化。治疗不仅可以从停止不良行为中获益,还可以从改善根源恐惧和焦虑中获益,这些恐惧和焦虑与条件和个人分离,但并不总是与行为表达有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信