Rethinking early years: how the neoliberal agenda fails children

Celia Burgess-Macey, Clare Kelly, M. Ouvry
{"title":"Rethinking early years: how the neoliberal agenda fails children","authors":"Celia Burgess-Macey, Clare Kelly, M. Ouvry","doi":"10.3898/soun.76.09.2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Early years education in England is in crisis. This article looks at what is needed to better provide the kind of education and care that young children need outside the home, from birth to school-starting age. It explores: the current arrangements and varieties of provision and approaches in England; educational and developmental research about young children’s development and early learning; the current national early years curriculum and how it contrasts to other international models and pedagogical approaches; the importance of play-based learning; the role of adults in observing, recording, assessing and supporting young children’s learning; and the holistic nature of children’s learning - which makes education and care inseparable in young children’s lives. Neoliberal governments have had little interest in these questions: they have been focused instead on marketising the sector, which has led to great inequality of provision; and they have been unwilling to provide the necessary funding to train staff and maintain appropriate learning environments; most fundamentally, they have engaged in an ideological drive to impose on very small children a narrow and formal curriculum that ignores all the evidence about good practice in the sector, and is focused on making them ‘school ready’ - that is, ready to fit into the rigid frameworks they have already imposed on primary school education.","PeriodicalId":403400,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.76.09.2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Early years education in England is in crisis. This article looks at what is needed to better provide the kind of education and care that young children need outside the home, from birth to school-starting age. It explores: the current arrangements and varieties of provision and approaches in England; educational and developmental research about young children’s development and early learning; the current national early years curriculum and how it contrasts to other international models and pedagogical approaches; the importance of play-based learning; the role of adults in observing, recording, assessing and supporting young children’s learning; and the holistic nature of children’s learning - which makes education and care inseparable in young children’s lives. Neoliberal governments have had little interest in these questions: they have been focused instead on marketising the sector, which has led to great inequality of provision; and they have been unwilling to provide the necessary funding to train staff and maintain appropriate learning environments; most fundamentally, they have engaged in an ideological drive to impose on very small children a narrow and formal curriculum that ignores all the evidence about good practice in the sector, and is focused on making them ‘school ready’ - that is, ready to fit into the rigid frameworks they have already imposed on primary school education.
反思早年:新自由主义议程如何让孩子们失望
摘要:英国早期教育面临危机。本文着眼于如何更好地提供幼儿从出生到入学年龄在家庭之外所需的教育和照顾。它探讨了:目前的安排和品种的规定和方法在英国;幼儿发展与早期学习的教育与发展研究;目前的国家早期课程及其与其他国际模式和教学方法的对比;基于游戏的学习的重要性;成人在观察、记录、评估和支持幼儿学习中的作用;以及儿童学习的整体性——这使得教育和照顾在幼儿的生活中不可分割。新自由主义政府对这些问题几乎没有兴趣:他们一直专注于将该部门市场化,这导致了供应的严重不平等;他们也不愿意提供必要的资金来培训工作人员和维持适当的学习环境;最根本的是,他们参与了一种意识形态的推动,把一种狭隘而正式的课程强加给很小的孩子,这种课程忽视了该部门良好实践的所有证据,并专注于让他们“准备好上学”——也就是说,准备好适应他们已经强加给小学教育的严格框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信