Post-2015 agenda: mission impossible?

J. Vandemoortele
{"title":"Post-2015 agenda: mission impossible?","authors":"J. Vandemoortele","doi":"10.1080/21665095.2014.943415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) have stirred people and mobilized actors into action to foster human well-being. Most stakeholders want a similar agenda beyond 2015. The article argues that a post-2015 agenda fit for the purpose is not ‘mission impossible’. Yet, it will require that some prerequisites are fulfilled which are currently being circumvented. Most importantly, two vital questions have to be answered regarding the ultimate purpose of global targets and whether the post-2015 agenda will be universal in scope or merely an extension of the existing global deal. Member states will also have to clarify the time horizon of the new agenda, its structure, its level of ambition, the benchmarks to be used, the integration of cross-cutting issues, as well as how to capture growing inequalities. Although they may seem technical in scope, most are political in nature. If stakeholders continue to focus on the list of global targets, the outcome of their negotiations will be either an overloaded agenda or no agenda at all. Each stakeholder has to choose between keeping the DNA of the MDGs intact – i.e. clear, concise, computable – or venturing into genetic modification that risks turning into an unending and fuzzy wish list.","PeriodicalId":273252,"journal":{"name":"Development Studies Research. An Open Access Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Studies Research. An Open Access Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2014.943415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) have stirred people and mobilized actors into action to foster human well-being. Most stakeholders want a similar agenda beyond 2015. The article argues that a post-2015 agenda fit for the purpose is not ‘mission impossible’. Yet, it will require that some prerequisites are fulfilled which are currently being circumvented. Most importantly, two vital questions have to be answered regarding the ultimate purpose of global targets and whether the post-2015 agenda will be universal in scope or merely an extension of the existing global deal. Member states will also have to clarify the time horizon of the new agenda, its structure, its level of ambition, the benchmarks to be used, the integration of cross-cutting issues, as well as how to capture growing inequalities. Although they may seem technical in scope, most are political in nature. If stakeholders continue to focus on the list of global targets, the outcome of their negotiations will be either an overloaded agenda or no agenda at all. Each stakeholder has to choose between keeping the DNA of the MDGs intact – i.e. clear, concise, computable – or venturing into genetic modification that risks turning into an unending and fuzzy wish list.
2015年后议程:不可能完成的任务?
千年发展目标鼓舞了人民,动员了行动者采取行动,促进人类福祉。大多数利益相关者希望在2015年之后有一个类似的议程。这篇文章认为,符合这一目的的2015年后议程并不是“不可能完成的任务”。然而,它需要满足一些先决条件,而这些先决条件目前正在被规避。最重要的是,必须回答两个至关重要的问题,即全球目标的最终目的,以及2015年后的议程是在范围上具有普遍性,还是仅仅是现有全球协议的延伸。会员国还必须澄清新议程的时间范围、结构、目标水平、使用的基准、跨领域问题的整合,以及如何应对日益严重的不平等。尽管它们在范围上似乎是技术性的,但大多数都是政治性的。如果利益攸关方继续关注全球目标清单,其谈判的结果要么是议程超载,要么根本没有议程。每个利益相关者都必须在保持千年发展目标的DNA完整(即清晰、简洁、可计算)或冒险进行基因改造之间做出选择,这有可能变成一个无休止的模糊愿望清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信