Teaching and Iterative Improvement: The Impact of Instructor Implementation of Courseware on Student Outcomes

Martha Hubertz, R. V. Campenhout
{"title":"Teaching and Iterative Improvement: The Impact of Instructor Implementation of Courseware on Student Outcomes","authors":"Martha Hubertz, R. V. Campenhout","doi":"10.22492/issn.2189-1036.2022.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students need digital learning resources that will benefit their learning process, and educators need tools that provide meaningful data insights and can be integrated into their teaching practice. Courseware as a learning resource is designed based on learning science principles to optimize the learning process for students. However, it is also well-known that digital resources do not get optimum engagement on their own. The instructor’s approach for implementation can have a sizable impact on student engagement—and ultimately—on outcomes. In this paper, we will compare two Psychology courses run in the Spring of 2020 and Spring of 2021 at the University of Central Florida. The courseware used was initially created by artificial intelligence and further enhanced by the instructor and instructional designer. The instructor taught both classes online using the same courseware, but made changes to how she implemented it. We will compare data from both sections to understand how these implementation changes impacted students—from platform engagement and learning data to student exam data. Results show that the instructor’s implementation changes increased student use of the courseware throughout the semester, and also increased exam scores. This direct comparison showcases the importance of instructor choices when incorporating digital resources into the classroom and provides a set of successful implementation practices for other educators to model in the future. In a time of significant change in education, it is more important than ever to better understand how technology and teaching practice can work together to help students be successful.","PeriodicalId":297862,"journal":{"name":"IICE Official Conference Proceedings","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IICE Official Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2189-1036.2022.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Students need digital learning resources that will benefit their learning process, and educators need tools that provide meaningful data insights and can be integrated into their teaching practice. Courseware as a learning resource is designed based on learning science principles to optimize the learning process for students. However, it is also well-known that digital resources do not get optimum engagement on their own. The instructor’s approach for implementation can have a sizable impact on student engagement—and ultimately—on outcomes. In this paper, we will compare two Psychology courses run in the Spring of 2020 and Spring of 2021 at the University of Central Florida. The courseware used was initially created by artificial intelligence and further enhanced by the instructor and instructional designer. The instructor taught both classes online using the same courseware, but made changes to how she implemented it. We will compare data from both sections to understand how these implementation changes impacted students—from platform engagement and learning data to student exam data. Results show that the instructor’s implementation changes increased student use of the courseware throughout the semester, and also increased exam scores. This direct comparison showcases the importance of instructor choices when incorporating digital resources into the classroom and provides a set of successful implementation practices for other educators to model in the future. In a time of significant change in education, it is more important than ever to better understand how technology and teaching practice can work together to help students be successful.
教学与迭代改进:教师实施课件对学生成绩的影响
学生需要有利于他们学习过程的数字学习资源,教育工作者需要能够提供有意义的数据见解并能整合到教学实践中的工具。课件作为一种学习资源,是根据学习科学原理设计的,旨在优化学生的学习过程。然而,众所周知,数字资源本身并不能获得最佳的用户粘性。教师的实施方法可以对学生的参与产生相当大的影响,并最终对结果产生影响。在本文中,我们将比较中佛罗里达大学2020年春季和2021年春季开设的两门心理学课程。使用的课件最初是由人工智能创建的,并由讲师和教学设计师进一步改进。这名教师使用相同的课件在线教授这两门课,但她对课件的实施方式做了一些改变。我们将比较这两个部分的数据,以了解这些实施变化如何影响学生——从平台参与度和学习数据到学生考试数据。结果表明,教师的实施改变增加了学生在整个学期使用课件,也提高了考试成绩。这种直接的比较显示了在将数字资源纳入课堂时选择教师的重要性,并为其他教育工作者提供了一套成功的实施实践,以供将来学习。在教育发生重大变化的时代,更好地理解技术和教学实践如何协同工作以帮助学生取得成功比以往任何时候都更加重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信