THE CONNECTION BETWEEN TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC AND EGOLOGY: HISTORICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECT

Y. Sedov
{"title":"THE CONNECTION BETWEEN TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC AND EGOLOGY: HISTORICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECT","authors":"Y. Sedov","doi":"10.25198/2077-7175-2021-3-130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article substantiates the need to create a pure egology in order to analyze the structures of consciousness. The relevance of egological research is to form the foundation for disparate cognitive sciences. On the basis of the historical and philosophical approach, the idea of transcendental logic is considered and it is concluded that it is essentially correlated with the analysis of consciousness. Transcendental logic takes into account the pure content of human thinking, which is not reduced to an empirical composition. Results. 1. The question of the dual nature of logic was first raised by the ancient Stoics, who included in it a section devoted to the analysis of impressions and the formulation of criteria for knowledge. 2. The idea of transcendental logic is presented in its expanded form in the works of Kant, who divided it into analytics and dialectics. In the analytical section, Kant is confronted with a paradox — with the division of the pure I into two parts: active subject and passive object. The identity of these parts does not give any knowledge of how the pure I exist in itself. As a result of the transcendental analysis, a distinction is introduced between the pure and the empirical subject. 3. Hegel’s critical reinterpretation of the idea of transcendental logic leads to a new division, in which it corresponds to an objective logic that takes into account the content of knowledge and its origin. 4. The connection between logic and egology was found in Husserl’s later works, most systematically in “Formal and Transcendental Logic”. Transcendental logic is a subjectively oriented study that clarifies the constitutive activity of pure consciousness. The scientific novelty of the research consists in the fact that the pure I as a subject of egology contains and produces objective logical formations. Formal logic is concerned with inference and proof, being a demonstrative rather than descriptive discipline. This lack of formal logic can only be eliminated by transcendental logic, which directly addresses the experience of pure consciousness. It should be used to study the subjective structures that underlie theoretical reason. Thanks to the experience of egology, there is a real opportunity in the future to solve the question of reason in its relevance and live performance, in which objective formations find their source.","PeriodicalId":315085,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence. Innovations. Investment","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence. Innovations. Investment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2021-3-130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article substantiates the need to create a pure egology in order to analyze the structures of consciousness. The relevance of egological research is to form the foundation for disparate cognitive sciences. On the basis of the historical and philosophical approach, the idea of transcendental logic is considered and it is concluded that it is essentially correlated with the analysis of consciousness. Transcendental logic takes into account the pure content of human thinking, which is not reduced to an empirical composition. Results. 1. The question of the dual nature of logic was first raised by the ancient Stoics, who included in it a section devoted to the analysis of impressions and the formulation of criteria for knowledge. 2. The idea of transcendental logic is presented in its expanded form in the works of Kant, who divided it into analytics and dialectics. In the analytical section, Kant is confronted with a paradox — with the division of the pure I into two parts: active subject and passive object. The identity of these parts does not give any knowledge of how the pure I exist in itself. As a result of the transcendental analysis, a distinction is introduced between the pure and the empirical subject. 3. Hegel’s critical reinterpretation of the idea of transcendental logic leads to a new division, in which it corresponds to an objective logic that takes into account the content of knowledge and its origin. 4. The connection between logic and egology was found in Husserl’s later works, most systematically in “Formal and Transcendental Logic”. Transcendental logic is a subjectively oriented study that clarifies the constitutive activity of pure consciousness. The scientific novelty of the research consists in the fact that the pure I as a subject of egology contains and produces objective logical formations. Formal logic is concerned with inference and proof, being a demonstrative rather than descriptive discipline. This lack of formal logic can only be eliminated by transcendental logic, which directly addresses the experience of pure consciousness. It should be used to study the subjective structures that underlie theoretical reason. Thanks to the experience of egology, there is a real opportunity in the future to solve the question of reason in its relevance and live performance, in which objective formations find their source.
先验逻辑与自我学的联系:历史与哲学的层面
为了分析意识的结构,需要建立一个纯粹的自我学。地质学研究的相关性为不同的认知科学奠定了基础。在历史和哲学方法的基础上,思考了先验逻辑的思想,并得出结论,它本质上是与意识分析相关的。先验逻辑考虑的是人类思维的纯粹内容,而不是简化为经验的内容。结果。1。逻辑的二重性问题最早是由古代斯多葛学派提出的,他在其中有一节专门研究印象的分析和知识标准的制定。2. 先验逻辑的概念在康德的著作中得到了扩展,他将其分为分析和辩证法。在分析部分,康德面临着一个悖论——将纯粹的我分为主动主体和被动客体两部分。这些部分的同一性并没有提供关于纯粹的我如何存在于自身的任何知识。作为先验分析的结果,在纯粹主体和经验主体之间引入了一种区别。3.黑格尔对先验逻辑概念的批判性重新解释导致了一种新的划分,在这种划分中,它对应于考虑知识内容及其起源的客观逻辑。4. 在胡塞尔的后期著作中,最系统的是《形式与先验逻辑》,发现了逻辑学与伦理学之间的联系。先验逻辑是一种主体性的研究,它阐明了纯粹意识的构成活动。这一研究的科学新颖性在于,作为自我学的主体,纯粹的自我包含并产生客观的逻辑形式。形式逻辑与推理和证明有关,是一门论证性的学科,而不是描述性的学科。这种形式逻辑的缺乏只能通过先验逻辑来消除,它直接解决纯粹意识的经验。它应该用来研究理论理性背后的主观结构。由于生态学的经验,在未来有一个真正的机会来解决理性在其相关性和现场表演中的问题,在其中客观形成找到它们的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信