Patterns of Self Medication Among Educated and Uneducated Population in a University Setting in Lahore, Pakistan: A Cross Sectional Survey

Sehrish Khalid, Ishrat Younus, Saima Hussain, Faiza Naveed, Javaid Iqbal
{"title":"Patterns of Self Medication Among Educated and Uneducated Population in a University Setting in Lahore, Pakistan: A Cross Sectional Survey","authors":"Sehrish Khalid, Ishrat Younus, Saima Hussain, Faiza Naveed, Javaid Iqbal","doi":"10.21694/2380-5706.19001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: Self-medication is gaining attention and is becoming a public health concern. Malpractice of self-medication is associated with risks such as misdiagnosis, overdose, prolonged duration, drug interactions and poly-pharmacy; which causes increased burden on the individual and is problematic in the elderly. This study evaluated the prevalence and patterns of self-medication among Educated and Uneducated population in a university setting in Pakistan. Methods: A descriptive crosssectional study was conducted in 100 individuals (educated: 50 and uneducated: 50). A questionnaire was filled consisting questions related to symptoms that necessitate self-medication, motive for self-medication and the sources of information about medication. Results: There was no significant difference in prevalence of self-medication in educated (68%) and uneducated samples (60%). Headache (32%), fever (30%), cough (16%) and gastric problems (8%) were the common symptoms for which self-medication were sought. However, Self-mediation for headache (36% vs 28%) and fever (32% vs 28%) was significantly higher in uneducated vs educated sample. The main reasons to selfmedicate among educated population vs uneducated included conditions not serious (48% vs 32%); lack of time (48% vs. 20%), whereas, 44% uneducated reported to save money as compared to 4% educated sample. The common source for self-medication in both the samples were past experience (56%) and advice from others (24%), however, advertisement as a source of self-medication prevailed in uneducated sample (20%) as compared to educated sample (8%). Conclusion: Self-medication is prevalent in educated and uneducated population. The drug authorities must regulate policies to provide safe and cost effective products, in particular to safe antibiotic usage and prevent adverse effects of drugs. Standards should be applied to the provision of information and advertisement to ensure responsible self-medication.","PeriodicalId":360753,"journal":{"name":"American Research Journal of Pharmacy","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Research Journal of Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21694/2380-5706.19001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective: Self-medication is gaining attention and is becoming a public health concern. Malpractice of self-medication is associated with risks such as misdiagnosis, overdose, prolonged duration, drug interactions and poly-pharmacy; which causes increased burden on the individual and is problematic in the elderly. This study evaluated the prevalence and patterns of self-medication among Educated and Uneducated population in a university setting in Pakistan. Methods: A descriptive crosssectional study was conducted in 100 individuals (educated: 50 and uneducated: 50). A questionnaire was filled consisting questions related to symptoms that necessitate self-medication, motive for self-medication and the sources of information about medication. Results: There was no significant difference in prevalence of self-medication in educated (68%) and uneducated samples (60%). Headache (32%), fever (30%), cough (16%) and gastric problems (8%) were the common symptoms for which self-medication were sought. However, Self-mediation for headache (36% vs 28%) and fever (32% vs 28%) was significantly higher in uneducated vs educated sample. The main reasons to selfmedicate among educated population vs uneducated included conditions not serious (48% vs 32%); lack of time (48% vs. 20%), whereas, 44% uneducated reported to save money as compared to 4% educated sample. The common source for self-medication in both the samples were past experience (56%) and advice from others (24%), however, advertisement as a source of self-medication prevailed in uneducated sample (20%) as compared to educated sample (8%). Conclusion: Self-medication is prevalent in educated and uneducated population. The drug authorities must regulate policies to provide safe and cost effective products, in particular to safe antibiotic usage and prevent adverse effects of drugs. Standards should be applied to the provision of information and advertisement to ensure responsible self-medication.
巴基斯坦拉合尔一所大学中受教育和未受教育人群的自我用药模式:一项横断面调查
背景与目的:自我药疗越来越受到人们的关注,并正在成为一个公共卫生问题。自我药疗的不当行为与误诊、过量、持续时间延长、药物相互作用和多种用药等风险有关;这会增加个人的负担,对老年人来说是个问题。本研究评估了巴基斯坦一所大学中受教育和未受教育人群自我药疗的流行程度和模式。方法:对100例个体进行描述性横断面研究(受教育50例,未受教育50例)。填写了一份调查问卷,包括与需要自我用药的症状、自我用药的动机和用药信息来源有关的问题。结果:受教育样本(68%)和未受教育样本(60%)的自我药疗患病率无显著差异。头痛(32%)、发烧(30%)、咳嗽(16%)和胃病(8%)是寻求自我药物治疗的常见症状。然而,自我调解头痛(36%对28%)和发烧(32%对28%)在未受教育的样本中明显高于受过教育的样本。受教育人群与未受教育人群自我用药的主要原因包括:病情不严重(48%对32%);缺乏时间(48%对20%),而44%未受教育的人表示会存钱,而受过教育的人只有4%。在这两个样本中,自我药疗的常见来源是过去的经验(56%)和他人的建议(24%),然而,与受过教育的样本(8%)相比,广告作为自我药疗的来源在未受教育的样本中普遍存在(20%)。结论:自我药疗在受教育人群和未受教育人群中普遍存在。药品主管部门必须规范政策,以提供安全和具有成本效益的产品,特别是安全使用抗生素和防止药物的不良反应。应在提供信息和广告方面适用标准,以确保负责任的自我药疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信