Examining a Critical Geopolitics in the Determination of Indonesia and Timor Leste Land Boundaries in Noel Besi – Citrana Segment

I. Kartini, Aditya Bayu Perdana, M. Kosandi
{"title":"Examining a Critical Geopolitics in the Determination of Indonesia and Timor Leste Land Boundaries in Noel Besi – Citrana Segment","authors":"I. Kartini, Aditya Bayu Perdana, M. Kosandi","doi":"10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.4.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the determination of Indonesia and Timor Leste land boundaries, especially in the Noel Besi - Citrana segment. This study uses critical geopolitical analysis, especially the geopolitical vision according to Agnew (2013) and O Tuathail (1996), to explain the issue of land boundaries in the Noel Besi – Citrana segment. This study uses qualitative methods, in which the primary data is drawn from in-depth interviews with several key informants. The secondary data is through scientific literature and news in online media. This study shows that the issue of land boundaries in the Noel Besi – Citrana segment is caused by the different geopolitical visions of the two countries (Indonesia and Timor Leste). Although the two countries both refer to the 1904 Treaty between the Netherlands and the Portuguese, which contains a territorial boundary agreement on the island of Timor, the two countries have different geopolitical visions. Indonesia perceives the mouth of the Noel Besi River as the beginning of determining the boundary line in the east. Meanwhile, Timor Leste perceives that the delimitation should be drawn from Noel Besi, depicted in a small ditch (Nono Tuinan) in the west. The two countries then visualized the Naktuka region in constructing a map of the country's boundaries based on their respective perceptions. These results support the arguments of Agnew (2013) and O Tuathail (1996), which emphasize the role of geopolitical vision in writing the world by visualizing the surrounding environment based on perceptions as outlined in the construction of images and maps.","PeriodicalId":431386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.4.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the determination of Indonesia and Timor Leste land boundaries, especially in the Noel Besi - Citrana segment. This study uses critical geopolitical analysis, especially the geopolitical vision according to Agnew (2013) and O Tuathail (1996), to explain the issue of land boundaries in the Noel Besi – Citrana segment. This study uses qualitative methods, in which the primary data is drawn from in-depth interviews with several key informants. The secondary data is through scientific literature and news in online media. This study shows that the issue of land boundaries in the Noel Besi – Citrana segment is caused by the different geopolitical visions of the two countries (Indonesia and Timor Leste). Although the two countries both refer to the 1904 Treaty between the Netherlands and the Portuguese, which contains a territorial boundary agreement on the island of Timor, the two countries have different geopolitical visions. Indonesia perceives the mouth of the Noel Besi River as the beginning of determining the boundary line in the east. Meanwhile, Timor Leste perceives that the delimitation should be drawn from Noel Besi, depicted in a small ditch (Nono Tuinan) in the west. The two countries then visualized the Naktuka region in constructing a map of the country's boundaries based on their respective perceptions. These results support the arguments of Agnew (2013) and O Tuathail (1996), which emphasize the role of geopolitical vision in writing the world by visualizing the surrounding environment based on perceptions as outlined in the construction of images and maps.
审视在诺埃尔贝西-西特拉纳段确定印度尼西亚和东帝汶陆地边界的关键地缘政治
本研究考察了印度尼西亚和东帝汶陆地边界的确定,特别是在诺埃尔贝西-西特拉纳段。本研究使用关键的地缘政治分析,特别是根据Agnew(2013)和O Tuathail(1996)的地缘政治视野,来解释Noel Besi - Citrana段的土地边界问题。本研究采用定性方法,其中主要数据来自对几个关键线人的深入访谈。二手数据是通过科学文献和网络媒体上的新闻。本研究表明,Noel Besi - Citrana段的土地边界问题是由两个国家(印度尼西亚和东帝汶)的不同地缘政治愿景引起的。虽然这两个国家都提到1904年荷兰和葡萄牙之间的条约,其中包括帝汶岛的领土边界协议,但这两个国家有不同的地缘政治愿景。印度尼西亚将诺埃尔贝西河口视为确定东部边界线的起点。与此同时,东帝汶认为边界应该从诺埃尔贝西(Noel Besi)开始,描绘在西部的一条小沟里(Nono Tuinan)。然后,两国根据各自的看法,在绘制该国边界地图时,将纳图卡地区形象化。这些结果支持了Agnew(2013)和O Tuathail(1996)的观点,他们强调了地缘政治视角在书写世界中的作用,通过基于图像和地图构建中概述的感知来可视化周围环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信