TRENDS AND EFFORT DISTRIBUTION OF MEN’S 50 KM RACE WALKING

P. Peev
{"title":"TRENDS AND EFFORT DISTRIBUTION OF MEN’S 50 KM RACE WALKING","authors":"P. Peev","doi":"10.37393/icass2022/35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Race walking has been a highly technical event in the Olympic games since 1908. In the whole history of the discipline, the rules of walking define the technique and respectively the result. Since the last change of the rules in 1996, the results in 50 km race walking have constantly developed. No matter the facts, the Olympic committee decided to change the race distance to 35 km. The research aims to find reasons why they did this by analyzing the effort distribution of elite race-walking competitors in major championships. Tasks of the research are: 1) To analyze the development of the results in world championships; 2) To research some trends in effort distribution of elite race walkers. Methods: To accomplish the research task, we made a literature review and statistical analyses of the data of the last five major championships. Result: The champions have greater average speed than the other athletes. All of the first ten competitors have negative splits e.g., faster second half of the race but the medalists are the only athletes that maintain a speed that is similar to their average in the last 10-15 km. The leaders in the ranking have slower starting splits than the other walkers. Conclusion: Better results can be achieved if the athlete starts a little bit slower than the average speed and steadily increases it till the end of the race as much as possible.","PeriodicalId":143321,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding book Vol.1","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding book Vol.1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37393/icass2022/35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Race walking has been a highly technical event in the Olympic games since 1908. In the whole history of the discipline, the rules of walking define the technique and respectively the result. Since the last change of the rules in 1996, the results in 50 km race walking have constantly developed. No matter the facts, the Olympic committee decided to change the race distance to 35 km. The research aims to find reasons why they did this by analyzing the effort distribution of elite race-walking competitors in major championships. Tasks of the research are: 1) To analyze the development of the results in world championships; 2) To research some trends in effort distribution of elite race walkers. Methods: To accomplish the research task, we made a literature review and statistical analyses of the data of the last five major championships. Result: The champions have greater average speed than the other athletes. All of the first ten competitors have negative splits e.g., faster second half of the race but the medalists are the only athletes that maintain a speed that is similar to their average in the last 10-15 km. The leaders in the ranking have slower starting splits than the other walkers. Conclusion: Better results can be achieved if the athlete starts a little bit slower than the average speed and steadily increases it till the end of the race as much as possible.
男子50公里竞走运动趋势及力量分布
自1908年以来,竞走一直是奥运会上技术含量很高的项目。在这门学科的整个历史中,行走的规则分别定义了技术和结果。自1996年最后一次改变规则以来,50公里竞走的成绩不断发展。不管事实如何,奥委会决定将比赛距离改为35公里。该研究旨在通过分析主要锦标赛中优秀竞走选手的努力分配,找出他们这样做的原因。研究的任务是:1)分析世界锦标赛成绩的发展;2)研究优秀竞走运动员体力分配的一些趋势。方法:为了完成研究任务,我们对近五届大满贯赛事的数据进行了文献综述和统计分析。结果:冠军的平均速度高于其他运动员。所有前10名选手都有负分裂,例如,在比赛的后半段更快,但奖牌获得者是唯一在最后10-15公里保持与平均速度相似的运动员。排名靠前的选手的起跑速度比其他选手慢。结论:运动员起跑速度比平均速度慢一点,并尽可能稳定地提高到比赛结束,可以取得更好的成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信