Performance Reporting of APA :

Mst Sharifun Nesa
{"title":"Performance Reporting of APA :","authors":"Mst Sharifun Nesa","doi":"10.36609/bjpa.v30i1.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on implementing the Annual Performance Agreement (APA) in the land administration and examines the effectiveness of the performance measurement system of APA. One of the important objectives of this paper is to verify the accuracy and reliability of the performance information/data of the APA report through which the performance of the Upazila land office is measured. This verification is needed in order to observe whether the land administration is showing its actual performance achievement in the performance report to ensure accountability. In doing this, both primary and secondary data were collected from 9(nine) Upazila land offices and analysed. Research findings suggest that APA is not working well in land administration. This is indicated by the gap between reported performance and actual performance. It is also found that unethical practice of manipulating performance information is going on in the APA reporting. As a result, the very concept of accountability of the public managers is not ensured, and the lofty target of providing better service to the citizens is hampered. Moreover, because of not showing the actual performance to the principal (political leaders) through performance report, wrong evaluation of the performance of the Land Administration is made, and the low productivity of the service delivery is hidden. So, the government cannot come to know the problems or causes of the non-compliance of the agreed targets and take any favourable decision or allocate resources in favour of that land office to increase productivity and meet the public demand of service delivery. So, the problem of data/information manipulation in APA's performance report urgently needs to be addressed by adopting an appropriate policy.","PeriodicalId":150983,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Public Administration","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36609/bjpa.v30i1.131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper focuses on implementing the Annual Performance Agreement (APA) in the land administration and examines the effectiveness of the performance measurement system of APA. One of the important objectives of this paper is to verify the accuracy and reliability of the performance information/data of the APA report through which the performance of the Upazila land office is measured. This verification is needed in order to observe whether the land administration is showing its actual performance achievement in the performance report to ensure accountability. In doing this, both primary and secondary data were collected from 9(nine) Upazila land offices and analysed. Research findings suggest that APA is not working well in land administration. This is indicated by the gap between reported performance and actual performance. It is also found that unethical practice of manipulating performance information is going on in the APA reporting. As a result, the very concept of accountability of the public managers is not ensured, and the lofty target of providing better service to the citizens is hampered. Moreover, because of not showing the actual performance to the principal (political leaders) through performance report, wrong evaluation of the performance of the Land Administration is made, and the low productivity of the service delivery is hidden. So, the government cannot come to know the problems or causes of the non-compliance of the agreed targets and take any favourable decision or allocate resources in favour of that land office to increase productivity and meet the public demand of service delivery. So, the problem of data/information manipulation in APA's performance report urgently needs to be addressed by adopting an appropriate policy.
APA业绩报告:
本文以年度绩效协议(APA)在土地管理中的实施为研究对象,考察了APA绩效评估体系的有效性。本文的一个重要目标是验证APA报告的绩效信息/数据的准确性和可靠性,通过APA报告衡量Upazila土地办公室的绩效。为了观察土地管理部门是否在业绩报告中显示其实际业绩,以确保问责制,需要进行这种核实。在此过程中,从9个Upazila土地办公室收集了第一手和第二手数据并进行了分析。研究结果表明,APA在土地管理中没有很好地发挥作用。报告的绩效与实际绩效之间的差距表明了这一点。还发现APA报告中存在操纵绩效信息的不道德行为。其结果是,公共管理人员的问责制得不到保证,向公民提供更好服务的崇高目标受到阻碍。此外,由于没有通过绩效报告向主要负责人(政治领导人)展示实际绩效,因此对土地管理局的绩效做出了错误的评估,从而隐藏了服务提供的低生产率。因此,政府无法了解不遵守商定目标的问题或原因,并采取任何有利的决定或分配资源,以有利于该土地办公室提高生产力,满足公众对服务交付的需求。因此,APA绩效报告中的数据/信息操纵问题迫切需要通过采取适当的政策来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信