AN ANALYSIS OF ADJACENCY PAIRS IN SPEAKING CLASS AT CEC KAMPOENG PARE MATARAM 2022

Purnawan Aropi, Sahuddin, Y. Lestari
{"title":"AN ANALYSIS OF ADJACENCY PAIRS IN SPEAKING CLASS AT CEC KAMPOENG PARE MATARAM 2022","authors":"Purnawan Aropi, Sahuddin, Y. Lestari","doi":"10.29303/j.v2i1.271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed at finding and analyzing the types of Adjacency Pairs and their preference structures used by a teacher and students in speaking class. This study used a descriptive research method using changing observer. The sample included teacher and students of 2nd Level speaking class at Cake English Course (CEC) Kampoeng Pare Mataram. The data were collected using video recording then transcribed to be analyzed. The study shows that there are eleven types of adjacency pairs and seven of their preference structures discovered in teaching learning process. The first type is question – answer in which its preference structure is expected as preferred response and unexpected as unpreferred one. The second type is request – acceptance/rejection which acceptance is as preferred and rejection as unpreferred response of its preference structure. The next type is apology – acceptance/refusal in which both preferred and unpreferred occurred as preference structures in this type. Then, complaint – apology/denial was found in which its preference structure is preferred and unpreferred. Furthermore, invitation – acceptance in which its acceptance response is known as preferred response in preference structure. Lastly, suggestion – disagreement and offer – rejection, each of this pair has its preference structure in formed of unpreferred. However, announcement – acknowledgment, greeting – greeting, summon – answer and closing – closing adjacency pairs also occurred in this study, yet their preference structure does not exist.","PeriodicalId":301632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/j.v2i1.271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed at finding and analyzing the types of Adjacency Pairs and their preference structures used by a teacher and students in speaking class. This study used a descriptive research method using changing observer. The sample included teacher and students of 2nd Level speaking class at Cake English Course (CEC) Kampoeng Pare Mataram. The data were collected using video recording then transcribed to be analyzed. The study shows that there are eleven types of adjacency pairs and seven of their preference structures discovered in teaching learning process. The first type is question – answer in which its preference structure is expected as preferred response and unexpected as unpreferred one. The second type is request – acceptance/rejection which acceptance is as preferred and rejection as unpreferred response of its preference structure. The next type is apology – acceptance/refusal in which both preferred and unpreferred occurred as preference structures in this type. Then, complaint – apology/denial was found in which its preference structure is preferred and unpreferred. Furthermore, invitation – acceptance in which its acceptance response is known as preferred response in preference structure. Lastly, suggestion – disagreement and offer – rejection, each of this pair has its preference structure in formed of unpreferred. However, announcement – acknowledgment, greeting – greeting, summon – answer and closing – closing adjacency pairs also occurred in this study, yet their preference structure does not exist.
汉语口语课堂邻接语对分析[j] .国语,2022
本研究旨在发现并分析一位教师和学生在口语课堂上使用邻接语对的类型及其偏好结构。本研究采用变化观察者的描述性研究方法。样本包括蛋糕英语课程(CEC)坎彭父母马塔兰的二级口语班的老师和学生。通过录像收集数据,然后进行转录分析。研究表明,在教学过程中发现了11种邻接对类型和7种邻接对偏好结构。第一种类型是问答,它的偏好结构是预期的作为首选响应,而非预期的作为非首选响应。第二种类型是请求-接受/拒绝,接受是其偏好结构的首选反应,拒绝是其非首选反应。第二种类型是道歉-接受/拒绝,在这种类型中,偏好和非偏好都作为偏好结构出现。投诉-道歉/否认的偏好结构为偏好和非偏好。在偏好结构中,邀请-接受反应被称为偏好反应。最后,建议-不同意和提议-拒绝,这对都有自己的偏好结构,以非首选的形式。然而,公告-确认、问候-问候、召唤-回答和关闭-关闭邻接对也在本研究中出现,但它们的偏好结构不存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信