Surgical Options for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence: Mastectomy Versus Repeat Breast-Conserving Surgery

H. Yeoh, J. Cheun, Han-Byoel Lee, W. Han, Hong-Kyu Kim
{"title":"Surgical Options for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence: Mastectomy Versus Repeat Breast-Conserving Surgery","authors":"H. Yeoh, J. Cheun, Han-Byoel Lee, W. Han, Hong-Kyu Kim","doi":"10.14449/jbd.2022.10.1.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The standard care for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a total mastectomy (TM); however, there is growing interest in repeating BCS for IBTR.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with IBTR who underwent initial BCS for breast cancer at our institution between January 2000 and December 2018. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival rates between the standard BCS-TM treatment group and the repeat-BCS group.Results: We enrolled 209 IBTR patients with a median follow-up of 102.3 months. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (10 years: 87.3% vs. 78.8%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-2.81; p=0.821), distant metastasis free survival (10 years: 73.9% vs. 77.7%; HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.37-1.72; p=0.727) and disease-free survival (10 years: 57.1% vs. 65.2%; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.35-1.12; p=0.115) between two groups. Repeat-BCS group showed significantly poorer locoregional recurrence free survival rate than did the TM group (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.06-5.56; p=0.029) but the significance was not shown after excluding ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence events.Conclusion: No significant differences were observed in survival outcomes and recurrence rates between patients with IBTR who underwent mastectomy or repeat BCS regardless of molecular subtype, except secondary IBTR rates.","PeriodicalId":245382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Disease","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14449/jbd.2022.10.1.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The standard care for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a total mastectomy (TM); however, there is growing interest in repeating BCS for IBTR.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with IBTR who underwent initial BCS for breast cancer at our institution between January 2000 and December 2018. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival rates between the standard BCS-TM treatment group and the repeat-BCS group.Results: We enrolled 209 IBTR patients with a median follow-up of 102.3 months. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (10 years: 87.3% vs. 78.8%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-2.81; p=0.821), distant metastasis free survival (10 years: 73.9% vs. 77.7%; HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.37-1.72; p=0.727) and disease-free survival (10 years: 57.1% vs. 65.2%; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.35-1.12; p=0.115) between two groups. Repeat-BCS group showed significantly poorer locoregional recurrence free survival rate than did the TM group (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.06-5.56; p=0.029) but the significance was not shown after excluding ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence events.Conclusion: No significant differences were observed in survival outcomes and recurrence rates between patients with IBTR who underwent mastectomy or repeat BCS regardless of molecular subtype, except secondary IBTR rates.
同侧乳房肿瘤复发的手术选择:乳房切除术与重复保乳手术
目的:保乳手术(BCS)后同侧乳腺肿瘤复发(IBTR)患者的标准治疗是全乳切除术(TM);然而,越来越多的人对在IBTR中重复BCS感兴趣。方法:我们回顾性分析了2000年1月至2018年12月期间在我院接受乳腺癌初始BCS治疗的IBTR患者。采用Kaplan-Meier法比较标准BCS-TM治疗组与重复bcs治疗组的生存率。结果:我们招募了209例IBTR患者,中位随访时间为102.3个月。总生存率无显著差异(10年:87.3% vs. 78.8%;风险比[HR], 1.11;95%置信区间[CI], 0.44-2.81;P =0.821),无远处转移生存率(10年:73.9% vs. 77.7%;人力资源,0.80;95% ci, 0.37-1.72;P =0.727)和无病生存率(10年:57.1% vs. 65.2%;人力资源,0.63;95% ci, 0.35-1.12;P =0.115)。Repeat-BCS组的局部无复发生存率明显低于TM组(HR, 2.44;95% ci, 1.06-5.56;P =0.029),但在排除同侧乳房肿瘤复发事件后,差异无统计学意义。结论:除继发性IBTR率外,接受乳房切除术或重复BCS的IBTR患者的生存结局和复发率无显著差异,无论分子亚型如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信