Pandemic Shock and the World after Crisis

A. Dynkin, E. Telegina, Leninskii Prosp. Moscow Russian Federation Gas
{"title":"Pandemic Shock and the World after Crisis","authors":"A. Dynkin, E. Telegina, Leninskii Prosp. Moscow Russian Federation Gas","doi":"10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-8-5-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coronavirus pandemia of 2020 turned to be a strong external shock for the modern global financial and economic systems It triggered a virtual cliff of many world markets, especially crude oil production and consumption COVID-19 also revealed serious shortcomings of public health systems and week governments' preparedness to virus epidemics, as well as different degrees of the ability to overcome resulting crisis Evidently, the world will eventually recover However, the process will be slow and complicated Deep structural and institutional changes will be needed Coronacrisis accelerated many emerging trends and developments in technologies, labor markets, and corporate governance Social isolation gave a powerful boost to IT, telecommunication, digital platforms, and gig economy Remote work model demonstrated its efficiency for high skill professionals in financial, legal services, consulting and education At the same time, low skilled jobs with limited remote access possibilities are likely to face growing troubles and declining incomes This will further aggravate problems of inequality and lack of social cohesion As for the international scene, there are already clear evidences of intensifying \"bi-polar disorder\" between USA and China This is a highly dangerous trend that will seriously hamper the global post-crisis revitalization As for the European Union, the coronavirus crisis highlighted the fragility of its currently existing architecture, namely the fundamental asymmetry between Europeanization of values and nationalization of interests Attempts to convert values into a sort of formal regulations like Schengen or Maastricht naturally meet the challenge from deeply enrooted human identities The EU needs either to make a decisive move towards unified budget or to rollback to more loose association In the nearest future we will see what type of adjustment is politically feasible During and after Covid-19 crisis an underlying trend emerged for re-focusing business activities and consumer demand towards intangible, non-material production and consumption The resources for this type of post-crisis development are intellectual and creative, as well as alternative non-carbon, thus they are basically renewable and unlimited Summing up, the authors suggest that societal and economic growth trajectories will be shifting towards the paradigm of responsible development","PeriodicalId":398103,"journal":{"name":"World Economy and International Relations","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Economy and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-8-5-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Coronavirus pandemia of 2020 turned to be a strong external shock for the modern global financial and economic systems It triggered a virtual cliff of many world markets, especially crude oil production and consumption COVID-19 also revealed serious shortcomings of public health systems and week governments' preparedness to virus epidemics, as well as different degrees of the ability to overcome resulting crisis Evidently, the world will eventually recover However, the process will be slow and complicated Deep structural and institutional changes will be needed Coronacrisis accelerated many emerging trends and developments in technologies, labor markets, and corporate governance Social isolation gave a powerful boost to IT, telecommunication, digital platforms, and gig economy Remote work model demonstrated its efficiency for high skill professionals in financial, legal services, consulting and education At the same time, low skilled jobs with limited remote access possibilities are likely to face growing troubles and declining incomes This will further aggravate problems of inequality and lack of social cohesion As for the international scene, there are already clear evidences of intensifying "bi-polar disorder" between USA and China This is a highly dangerous trend that will seriously hamper the global post-crisis revitalization As for the European Union, the coronavirus crisis highlighted the fragility of its currently existing architecture, namely the fundamental asymmetry between Europeanization of values and nationalization of interests Attempts to convert values into a sort of formal regulations like Schengen or Maastricht naturally meet the challenge from deeply enrooted human identities The EU needs either to make a decisive move towards unified budget or to rollback to more loose association In the nearest future we will see what type of adjustment is politically feasible During and after Covid-19 crisis an underlying trend emerged for re-focusing business activities and consumer demand towards intangible, non-material production and consumption The resources for this type of post-crisis development are intellectual and creative, as well as alternative non-carbon, thus they are basically renewable and unlimited Summing up, the authors suggest that societal and economic growth trajectories will be shifting towards the paradigm of responsible development
大流行的冲击和危机后的世界
2020年冠状病毒大流行成为对现代全球金融和经济体系的强烈外部冲击,引发了许多世界市场的虚拟悬崖,特别是原油生产和消费。COVID-19也暴露了公共卫生系统的严重缺陷,以及政府对病毒流行的准备不足,以及不同程度的克服危机的能力。新冠疫情加速了技术、劳动力市场和公司治理等领域的许多新趋势和发展,社会孤立有力地推动了信息技术、电信、数字平台和零工经济的发展,远程工作模式对金融、法律服务、咨询和教育等领域的高技能专业人员的效率得到了体现。这将进一步加剧不平等和缺乏社会凝聚力的问题。就国际舞台而言,已经有明显的证据表明,美国和中国之间的“两极分化”正在加剧。这是一个高度危险的趋势,将严重阻碍全球后危机时代的复兴。冠状病毒危机凸显了其现有架构的脆弱性,试图将价值观转化为一种像申根或马斯特里赫特条约那样的正式法规,自然会遇到来自根深蒂固的人类身份认同的挑战。欧盟需要采取果断行动,实现统一预算,或者退回到更松散的联系。在不久的将来,我们将看到什么样的调整在政治上是可行的。在新冠肺炎危机期间和之后,这是一个潜在的趋势这种后危机发展类型的资源是智力和创造性的,以及可替代的非碳资源,因此它们基本上是可再生的和无限的。综上所述,作者认为社会和经济增长轨迹将转向负责任的发展范式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信