O dilema do negociador e o acesso à justiça na mediação com a Fundação Renova: implicações ao processo indenizatório pelo rompimento da Barragem de Fundão e o modelo de claims resolution facilities como abordagem para o manejo de conflitos
Humberto Lima de Lucena Filho, Ygor Bastos Mesquita Minora de Almeida
{"title":"O dilema do negociador e o acesso à justiça na mediação com a Fundação Renova: implicações ao processo indenizatório pelo rompimento da Barragem de Fundão e o modelo de claims resolution facilities como abordagem para o manejo de conflitos","authors":"Humberto Lima de Lucena Filho, Ygor Bastos Mesquita Minora de Almeida","doi":"10.21708/issn2526-9488.v6.n11.p121-144.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The collapse of the Fundão dam is one of the greatest socio-environmental calamities. In order tospeed up the repair and compensation process, the Fundação Renova was created, an entity resposible for the Me-diated Indemnity Program (MIP), designed to deter-mining the amounts to be paid. Faced with the ex-posed situation, this paper analyzes the obstacles of the negotiator's dilemma to access to justice, through mediation, based on the adversities found in MIP. From the gathered elements, stands out that, despite presenting itself as a win-win approach, the MIP, by not incorporating the pricipled negotiation and by the effect of the negotiator's dilemma, culminating in agreements unfavorable to Renova and those im-pacted, an issue that, if not addressed, can be repro-duced in other claims resolution facilities. As a mech-anism to reverse this result, it is proposed to expand mediation, making it in charge of coordinating all communication with parties and eligibility to MIP, promoting, at the same time, relationship between the foundation and those affected, with the condi-tions for a mutual gains procedure.","PeriodicalId":416966,"journal":{"name":"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21708/issn2526-9488.v6.n11.p121-144.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The collapse of the Fundão dam is one of the greatest socio-environmental calamities. In order tospeed up the repair and compensation process, the Fundação Renova was created, an entity resposible for the Me-diated Indemnity Program (MIP), designed to deter-mining the amounts to be paid. Faced with the ex-posed situation, this paper analyzes the obstacles of the negotiator's dilemma to access to justice, through mediation, based on the adversities found in MIP. From the gathered elements, stands out that, despite presenting itself as a win-win approach, the MIP, by not incorporating the pricipled negotiation and by the effect of the negotiator's dilemma, culminating in agreements unfavorable to Renova and those im-pacted, an issue that, if not addressed, can be repro-duced in other claims resolution facilities. As a mech-anism to reverse this result, it is proposed to expand mediation, making it in charge of coordinating all communication with parties and eligibility to MIP, promoting, at the same time, relationship between the foundation and those affected, with the condi-tions for a mutual gains procedure.
fundo大坝的倒塌是最大的社会环境灾难之一。为了加快修复和赔偿进程,成立了重建基金会(funda o Renova),这是一个负责仲裁赔偿计划(MIP)的实体,旨在确定应支付的金额。面对暴露的情况,本文以MIP中的逆境为基础,分析了谈判者困境中通过调解诉诸司法的障碍。从所收集的因素来看,突出的是,尽管MIP本身是一种双赢的办法,但由于没有纳入有原则的谈判和谈判者的困境的影响,最终达成了对Renova和受影响者不利的协议,这个问题如果不加以解决,可能会在其他索赔解决机制中重现。作为扭转这一结果的机制,建议扩大调解,使其负责协调与当事人的所有沟通和MIP资格,同时促进基金会与受影响者之间的关系,并具备互惠互利的条件。