The importance of early suspicion of non-melanocytic malignant skin cancer (NMSC) in primary and secondary health care

Spomenka Paurević, D. Lukic, J. Grgic, N. Babić, D. Ivić, P. Lazić
{"title":"The importance of early suspicion of non-melanocytic malignant skin cancer (NMSC) in primary and secondary health care","authors":"Spomenka Paurević, D. Lukic, J. Grgic, N. Babić, D. Ivić, P. Lazić","doi":"10.5937/medist1601035p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prospective study, which took place from February 2011 to March 2014, included respondents who were sent for computerized dermoscopy because of non-melanocytic skin tumours. Respondents were divided into 2 groups. The first one, group A (45 respondents), consisted of respondents who had expressed concern about the observed changes in the skin and the desire for examination. The second one, group B (50 respondents) were respondents that did not come for examination due to changes on the skin, but for other reasons, so they had indirectly detected suspicious skin lesions. The aim of this study is to analyse the importance of early suspicion of non-melanocytic malignant skin tumours by specialists in primary and secondary health care. Parameters for comparison were respondents' subjective attitude of non-pigment skin lesions and dermoscopy and/or PH findings. It has been shown that changes in the skin that bleed are sometimes highly suspect of NMSC because group A had 5 such cases and NMSC was detected in 4 cases, and group B had 7 respondents with haemorrhage and there were 4 with NMSC. In group B, out of 12 respondents who said that they had found suspicious skin lesions caused by trauma, there were 8 NMSC, while in group A there were 3 cases, which is a statistically significant difference. In group B, out of 16 respondents who claimed that they had had suspicious skin changes dormant for years, NMSC has been proven in 3 cases, and in group A there was not NMSC which is also a statistically significant difference. It was confirmed that the claims of the respondents are unreliable and that all patients should be addressed to computer dermoscopy, in patients with visible changes that arise even a slightest suspicion of NMSC.","PeriodicalId":167411,"journal":{"name":"Medicinska istrazivanja","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinska istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/medist1601035p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prospective study, which took place from February 2011 to March 2014, included respondents who were sent for computerized dermoscopy because of non-melanocytic skin tumours. Respondents were divided into 2 groups. The first one, group A (45 respondents), consisted of respondents who had expressed concern about the observed changes in the skin and the desire for examination. The second one, group B (50 respondents) were respondents that did not come for examination due to changes on the skin, but for other reasons, so they had indirectly detected suspicious skin lesions. The aim of this study is to analyse the importance of early suspicion of non-melanocytic malignant skin tumours by specialists in primary and secondary health care. Parameters for comparison were respondents' subjective attitude of non-pigment skin lesions and dermoscopy and/or PH findings. It has been shown that changes in the skin that bleed are sometimes highly suspect of NMSC because group A had 5 such cases and NMSC was detected in 4 cases, and group B had 7 respondents with haemorrhage and there were 4 with NMSC. In group B, out of 12 respondents who said that they had found suspicious skin lesions caused by trauma, there were 8 NMSC, while in group A there were 3 cases, which is a statistically significant difference. In group B, out of 16 respondents who claimed that they had had suspicious skin changes dormant for years, NMSC has been proven in 3 cases, and in group A there was not NMSC which is also a statistically significant difference. It was confirmed that the claims of the respondents are unreliable and that all patients should be addressed to computer dermoscopy, in patients with visible changes that arise even a slightest suspicion of NMSC.
早期怀疑非黑素细胞恶性皮肤癌(NMSC)在初级和二级卫生保健中的重要性
这项前瞻性研究于2011年2月至2014年3月进行,其中包括因非黑素细胞性皮肤肿瘤而接受计算机皮肤镜检查的受访者。受访者被分为两组。第一组,A组(45名应答者),由对观察到的皮肤变化表示担忧并希望进行检查的应答者组成。第二组为B组(50人),因皮肤变化而未来检查,但因其他原因间接发现可疑皮肤病变。本研究的目的是分析由初级和二级卫生保健专家早期怀疑非黑素细胞恶性皮肤肿瘤的重要性。比较的参数是受访者对非色素皮肤病变和皮肤镜检查和/或PH结果的主观态度。有研究表明,皮肤出血的变化有时高度怀疑NMSC,因为A组有5例这样的病例,其中4例检测到NMSC, B组有7例出血,4例有NMSC。在B组的12名受访者中,有8例NMSC,而A组有3例,差异有统计学意义。在B组16名自称有可疑皮肤变化潜伏多年的受访者中,有3例被证实有NMSC,而A组没有NMSC,差异也有统计学意义。经证实,答复者的说法是不可靠的,所有患者都应该进行电脑皮肤镜检查,即使是最轻微的怀疑NMSC的可见变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信