Public Opinion about the Implementation of Public Activity Restriction in the Pandemic Era

P. Eyanoer, Harriyo Utomo
{"title":"Public Opinion about the Implementation of Public Activity Restriction in the Pandemic Era","authors":"P. Eyanoer, Harriyo Utomo","doi":"10.26911/ICPHmanagement.FP.08.2021.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Implementation of public activity restrictions has already replaced large-scale social restrictions in Indonesia since January 2021. This policy has been done and changed multiple times to adapt to increasing COVID-19 transmission. This study aimed to examine peoples knowledge and opinion about the implementation of public activity restrictions. Subjects and Method: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in September 2021. A sample of 301 lay people was selected for this study. The data were collected by questionnaire consisting of 10 questions. Results: As many as 99% of study participants knew the regulation and 81.1% understood it. 75% of the study participants agreed with working from home. As many as 100% agreed with opening of essential stores. 30.6% agreed with closing worship places. As many as 49.8% agreed with closing amusement parks and playground. 31.2% of the participants disagreed the health protocols. Conclusion: People have already known and implemented the public activity restrictions and agreed with the regulation.","PeriodicalId":399689,"journal":{"name":"Developing a Global Pandemic Exit Strategy and Framework for Global Health Security","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developing a Global Pandemic Exit Strategy and Framework for Global Health Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26911/ICPHmanagement.FP.08.2021.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Implementation of public activity restrictions has already replaced large-scale social restrictions in Indonesia since January 2021. This policy has been done and changed multiple times to adapt to increasing COVID-19 transmission. This study aimed to examine peoples knowledge and opinion about the implementation of public activity restrictions. Subjects and Method: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in September 2021. A sample of 301 lay people was selected for this study. The data were collected by questionnaire consisting of 10 questions. Results: As many as 99% of study participants knew the regulation and 81.1% understood it. 75% of the study participants agreed with working from home. As many as 100% agreed with opening of essential stores. 30.6% agreed with closing worship places. As many as 49.8% agreed with closing amusement parks and playground. 31.2% of the participants disagreed the health protocols. Conclusion: People have already known and implemented the public activity restrictions and agreed with the regulation.
疫情时代实施公共活动限制的民意分析
背景:自2021年1月以来,印度尼西亚实施的公共活动限制已经取代了大规模的社交限制。为适应COVID-19传播的增加,这一政策已多次实施和修改。本研究旨在考察人们对公共活动限制实施的认识和意见。对象和方法:这是一项横断面研究,于2021年9月进行。本研究选取了301名非专业人士作为样本。数据采用问卷收集,问卷共10个问题。结果:99%的研究参与者知道该规定,81.1%的人理解该规定。75%的研究参与者同意在家工作。多达100%的人同意开设基本商店。30.6%同意关闭礼拜场所。49.8%的人赞成关闭游乐园和游乐场。31.2%的参与者不同意健康方案。结论:公众已经知道并执行了公共活动限制规定,并同意该规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信