Horizontal inequality, status optimization, and interethnic marriage in a conflict-affected society

O. McDoom
{"title":"Horizontal inequality, status optimization, and interethnic marriage in a conflict-affected society","authors":"O. McDoom","doi":"10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2016/211-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although several theories of interethnic conflict emphasize ties across group boundaries as conducive to ethnic coexistence, little is known about how such ties are formed. Given their integrative potential, I examine the establishment of cross-ethnic marital ties in a deeply divided society and ask what drives individuals to defy powerful social norms and sanctions and to choose life-partners from across the divide. I theorize such choices as the outcome of a struggle between social forces and individual autonomy in society. I identify two channels through which social forces weaken and individual autonomy increases to allow ethnic group members to establish ties independently of group pressures: elite autonomy and status equalization. I find, first, that as an individual’s educational status increases, and second, as between-group inequality declines, individuals enjoy greater freedom in the choice of their social ties. However, I also find that in an ethnically ranked society this enhanced autonomy is exercised by members of high-ranked and low-ranked groups differently. Members from high-ranked groups become more likely to inmarry; low-ranked group members to outmarry. I suggest a status-optimization logic lies behind this divergent behaviour. Ethnic elites from high-ranked groups cannot improve their status through outmarriage and their coethnics, threatened by the rising status of the lower-ranked group, seek to maintain the distinctiveness of their status superiority through inmarriage. In contrast, as their own individual status or their group’s relative status improves, members of low-ranked groups take advantage of the opportunity to upmarry into the higher-ranked group. I establish these findings in the context of Mindanao, a conflict-affected society in the Philippines, using a combination of census micro-data on over two million marriages and in-depth interview data with inmarried and outmarried couples.","PeriodicalId":359449,"journal":{"name":"LSE Research Online Documents on Economics","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSE Research Online Documents on Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2016/211-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Although several theories of interethnic conflict emphasize ties across group boundaries as conducive to ethnic coexistence, little is known about how such ties are formed. Given their integrative potential, I examine the establishment of cross-ethnic marital ties in a deeply divided society and ask what drives individuals to defy powerful social norms and sanctions and to choose life-partners from across the divide. I theorize such choices as the outcome of a struggle between social forces and individual autonomy in society. I identify two channels through which social forces weaken and individual autonomy increases to allow ethnic group members to establish ties independently of group pressures: elite autonomy and status equalization. I find, first, that as an individual’s educational status increases, and second, as between-group inequality declines, individuals enjoy greater freedom in the choice of their social ties. However, I also find that in an ethnically ranked society this enhanced autonomy is exercised by members of high-ranked and low-ranked groups differently. Members from high-ranked groups become more likely to inmarry; low-ranked group members to outmarry. I suggest a status-optimization logic lies behind this divergent behaviour. Ethnic elites from high-ranked groups cannot improve their status through outmarriage and their coethnics, threatened by the rising status of the lower-ranked group, seek to maintain the distinctiveness of their status superiority through inmarriage. In contrast, as their own individual status or their group’s relative status improves, members of low-ranked groups take advantage of the opportunity to upmarry into the higher-ranked group. I establish these findings in the context of Mindanao, a conflict-affected society in the Philippines, using a combination of census micro-data on over two million marriages and in-depth interview data with inmarried and outmarried couples.
一个受冲突影响的社会中的横向不平等、地位优化与异族通婚
尽管关于种族间冲突的一些理论强调跨越群体边界的联系有利于种族共存,但人们对这种联系是如何形成的知之甚少。考虑到他们的整合潜力,我研究了在一个严重分裂的社会中跨种族婚姻关系的建立,并询问是什么驱使个人无视强大的社会规范和制裁,并从不同的鸿沟中选择生活伴侣。我将这种选择理论化,认为这是社会力量与个人在社会中的自主性之间斗争的结果。我确定了两种途径,即精英自治和地位平等,通过这两种途径,社会力量减弱,个人自治增加,从而允许族群成员建立独立于群体压力的联系。我发现,首先,随着个人受教育程度的提高,其次,随着群体间不平等的减少,个人在选择社会关系方面享有更大的自由。然而,我也发现,在一个种族等级分明的社会中,高等级和低等级群体的成员行使这种增强的自主权的方式是不同的。来自高地位群体的成员更有可能通婚;地位较低的群体成员通婚。我认为这种不同的行为背后隐藏着一种状态优化逻辑。来自高阶层群体的少数民族精英无法通过通婚来提高自己的地位,而他们的同族由于受到低阶层群体地位上升的威胁,寻求通过通婚来保持自己地位优势的独特性。相反,当他们自己的个人地位或群体的相对地位提高时,低等级群体的成员就会利用这个机会升入高等级群体。我在棉兰老岛的背景下建立了这些发现,棉兰老岛是菲律宾一个受冲突影响的社会,使用了超过200万对婚姻的人口普查微观数据和对未婚和未婚夫妇的深度访谈数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信