A comparison between piezoelectric sensors applied to multiple Partial Discharge detection by advanced signal processing analysis

A. Binotto, B. A. Castro, Vitor Vecina dos Santos, J. A. Rey, A. Andreoli
{"title":"A comparison between piezoelectric sensors applied to multiple Partial Discharge detection by advanced signal processing analysis","authors":"A. Binotto, B. A. Castro, Vitor Vecina dos Santos, J. A. Rey, A. Andreoli","doi":"10.3390/ecsa-7-08243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of sensors applied to failure detection systems for power transformers is a critical concern since this device stands out as a strategic component of the electric power system. Among the most common issues is the presence of partial discharges (PDs) in the insulation system of the transformer, which can lead the device to total failure. Aiming to prevent unexpected damages, several PD monitoring approaches have been developed. One of the most promising is the Acoustic Emission (AE) technique, which captures the acoustic signals generated by PDs using piezoelectric sensors. Although many studies have proved the effectiveness of AE, most signal processing approaches are strictly related to the frequency analysis of PD signals, which can hide important information such as the repetition rate of the failure. This article presents a comparison between two types of piezoelectric transducers: the microfiber composite (MFC) and the lead zirconate titanate (PZT). To ensure the detection of multiple PDs, time–frequency analysis was carried out by short-time Fourier transform (STFT). Intending to compare the sensibility of the transducers, the AE signals were windowed, and the root mean square (RMS) value was extracted for each part of the signal. The results indicate that spectrogram and RMS analysis have great potential to detect multiple PD activity. Although MFC was two times more sensitive to PD detection than the PZT sensor, PZT presents a higher frequency response band (0–100 kHz) than MFC (80 kHz).","PeriodicalId":270652,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 7th International Electronic Conference on Sensors and Applications","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 7th International Electronic Conference on Sensors and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-7-08243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The development of sensors applied to failure detection systems for power transformers is a critical concern since this device stands out as a strategic component of the electric power system. Among the most common issues is the presence of partial discharges (PDs) in the insulation system of the transformer, which can lead the device to total failure. Aiming to prevent unexpected damages, several PD monitoring approaches have been developed. One of the most promising is the Acoustic Emission (AE) technique, which captures the acoustic signals generated by PDs using piezoelectric sensors. Although many studies have proved the effectiveness of AE, most signal processing approaches are strictly related to the frequency analysis of PD signals, which can hide important information such as the repetition rate of the failure. This article presents a comparison between two types of piezoelectric transducers: the microfiber composite (MFC) and the lead zirconate titanate (PZT). To ensure the detection of multiple PDs, time–frequency analysis was carried out by short-time Fourier transform (STFT). Intending to compare the sensibility of the transducers, the AE signals were windowed, and the root mean square (RMS) value was extracted for each part of the signal. The results indicate that spectrogram and RMS analysis have great potential to detect multiple PD activity. Although MFC was two times more sensitive to PD detection than the PZT sensor, PZT presents a higher frequency response band (0–100 kHz) than MFC (80 kHz).
采用先进的信号处理分析方法对压电传感器在多次局部放电检测中的应用进行了比较
应用于电力变压器故障检测系统的传感器的发展是一个关键问题,因为该设备作为电力系统的战略组成部分脱颖而出。其中最常见的问题是变压器绝缘系统中存在局部放电(pd),这可能导致设备完全失效。为了防止意外损害,人们开发了几种局部放电监测方法。其中最有前途的是声发射(AE)技术,该技术利用压电传感器捕获pd产生的声信号。尽管许多研究已经证明了声发射的有效性,但大多数信号处理方法都严格与PD信号的频率分析相关,这可能会隐藏故障重复率等重要信息。本文介绍了两种类型的压电换能器:微纤维复合材料(MFC)和锆钛酸铅(PZT)。为了保证多重pd的检测,采用短时傅里叶变换(STFT)进行时频分析。为了比较传感器的灵敏度,将声发射信号加窗,提取各部分信号的均方根(RMS)值。结果表明,谱图和均方根分析在检测多种PD活性方面具有很大的潜力。虽然MFC对PD检测的灵敏度是PZT传感器的两倍,但PZT的频率响应带(0-100 kHz)高于MFC (80 kHz)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信