Study of three different fractionation regimens in palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases

S. Jilla, S. Ratnam, K. Naidu, I. Monica, M. Ranadheer, P. Suresh
{"title":"Study of three different fractionation regimens in palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases","authors":"S. Jilla, S. Ratnam, K. Naidu, I. Monica, M. Ranadheer, P. Suresh","doi":"10.15380/2277-5706.JCSR.13.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To assess the efficacy of single fraction with two different multi-fractionated radiotherapy regimens in treatment of painful bone metastases. Methods: Patients with painful bone metastases were randomly assigned to receive: Arm A: 8 Gray (Gy) in single fraction (n=15), Arm B: 20 Gy in 5 fractions at the rate of 4 Gy per fraction (n=15) and Arm C: 30 Gy in 10 fractions at the rate of 3 Gy per fraction (n=15). The arms were compared in terms of pain relief, performance improvement, analgesic requirement and duration of overall response at 1week, 1month, and 3 months after treatment. Results: Pain relief in Arms A, B and C at 1 week were 60%, 53.3% and 60%; at 1 month were 71.4%, 73.3%, 73.3%, at 3 months were 78.5%, 80% and 80% respectively. Performance improvement in Arm A, B and C at 1 week 60%, at 1 month 65%, 66% and 66%, at 3 months 78.5% ,80% and 80% respectively. Duration of overall response in all the patients who improved after therapy is 3 months There was no statistically significant difference between three arms with respect to pain relief, performance improvement, analgesic requirement and duration of overall response. Conclusions: The 8 Gy Single fraction is as efficacious as multi-fractionated regimens. Moreover, it is less expensive, decreases duration of hospital stay so single fraction can be used as an effective palliation method. Jilla S, Ratnam SV, Naidu KVJR, Monica I, Ranadheer M, Suresh P. Study of three different fractionation regimens in palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases. J Clin Sci Res 2014;3:90-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15380/22775706.JCSR.13.025. Received: 28 May, 2013. Corresponding author: Dr Swapna Jilla, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, India. e-mail: swapnaranadheer@gmail.com Three different fractionation regimens for bone metastates Jilla et al","PeriodicalId":405143,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15380/2277-5706.JCSR.13.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: To assess the efficacy of single fraction with two different multi-fractionated radiotherapy regimens in treatment of painful bone metastases. Methods: Patients with painful bone metastases were randomly assigned to receive: Arm A: 8 Gray (Gy) in single fraction (n=15), Arm B: 20 Gy in 5 fractions at the rate of 4 Gy per fraction (n=15) and Arm C: 30 Gy in 10 fractions at the rate of 3 Gy per fraction (n=15). The arms were compared in terms of pain relief, performance improvement, analgesic requirement and duration of overall response at 1week, 1month, and 3 months after treatment. Results: Pain relief in Arms A, B and C at 1 week were 60%, 53.3% and 60%; at 1 month were 71.4%, 73.3%, 73.3%, at 3 months were 78.5%, 80% and 80% respectively. Performance improvement in Arm A, B and C at 1 week 60%, at 1 month 65%, 66% and 66%, at 3 months 78.5% ,80% and 80% respectively. Duration of overall response in all the patients who improved after therapy is 3 months There was no statistically significant difference between three arms with respect to pain relief, performance improvement, analgesic requirement and duration of overall response. Conclusions: The 8 Gy Single fraction is as efficacious as multi-fractionated regimens. Moreover, it is less expensive, decreases duration of hospital stay so single fraction can be used as an effective palliation method. Jilla S, Ratnam SV, Naidu KVJR, Monica I, Ranadheer M, Suresh P. Study of three different fractionation regimens in palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases. J Clin Sci Res 2014;3:90-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15380/22775706.JCSR.13.025. Received: 28 May, 2013. Corresponding author: Dr Swapna Jilla, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, India. e-mail: swapnaranadheer@gmail.com Three different fractionation regimens for bone metastates Jilla et al
疼痛性骨转移瘤姑息性放疗中三种不同分割方案的研究
背景:评价单次放疗联合两种不同的多次放疗方案治疗骨转移性疼痛的疗效。方法:疼痛性骨转移患者随机分为:A组:8 Gy /单次放疗(n=15); B组:20 Gy / 5次放疗,每次放疗4 Gy (n=15); C组:30 Gy / 10次放疗,每次放疗3 Gy (n=15)。在治疗后1周、1个月和3个月比较两组患者的疼痛缓解、表现改善、镇痛需求和总体缓解持续时间。结果:A、B、C组1周疼痛缓解率分别为60%、53.3%、60%;1个月时分别为71.4%、73.3%、73.3%,3个月时分别为78.5%、80%、80%。A组、B组和C组1周时的疗效改善60%,1个月时的疗效改善65%、66%和66%,3个月时的疗效改善78.5%、80%和80%。治疗后改善患者的总反应持续时间均为3个月。三组患者在疼痛缓解、表现改善、镇痛需求和总反应持续时间方面无统计学差异。结论:8gy单组分治疗与多组分治疗效果相同。此外,它更便宜,缩短了住院时间,因此单一分数可以作为一种有效的姑息方法。Jilla S, Ratnam SV, Naidu KVJR, Monica I, Ranadheer M, Suresh P.三种不同分割方案在疼痛性骨转移的姑息性放疗中的研究。中华临床医学杂志2014;3:90-6。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15380/22775706.JCSR.13.025。收稿日期:2013年5月28日。通讯作者:Swapna Jilla博士,印度蒂鲁帕蒂Sri Venkateswara医学科学研究所放射肿瘤科助理教授。三种不同的骨转移分离方案Jilla等
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信