{"title":"Political Finance in the United Kingdom","authors":"Timothy Winters","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2317505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers the topic of political finance in the United Kingdom through the lens of institutional corruption. It gives an introduction to two core principles, spending limits and transparency, which underpin current legislation surrounding political finance in the UK. It then addresses the possibility of a cap on donations, as recommended by the British government’s Committee on Standards in Public Life. Finally, it reflects on the roles of trade unions, the media and other third parties as aspects of the British establishment which are of particular relevance to the subject of institutional corruption. Through this brief overview of the system of political finance in the United Kingdom, it will be seen that the concept of institutional corruption is as relevant to the British context as it is to the US. Despite differences, particularly with regard to the specific roles of various stakeholders, it is apparent that there are similarities between the two systems, for instance with regard to the role of third-party funders, the debate between ensuring freedom of speech and leveling the electoral playing field, and the importance of transparency, not only in law but also in practice.","PeriodicalId":315164,"journal":{"name":"Edmond J. Safra Research Lab Working Paper Series","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edmond J. Safra Research Lab Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2317505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper considers the topic of political finance in the United Kingdom through the lens of institutional corruption. It gives an introduction to two core principles, spending limits and transparency, which underpin current legislation surrounding political finance in the UK. It then addresses the possibility of a cap on donations, as recommended by the British government’s Committee on Standards in Public Life. Finally, it reflects on the roles of trade unions, the media and other third parties as aspects of the British establishment which are of particular relevance to the subject of institutional corruption. Through this brief overview of the system of political finance in the United Kingdom, it will be seen that the concept of institutional corruption is as relevant to the British context as it is to the US. Despite differences, particularly with regard to the specific roles of various stakeholders, it is apparent that there are similarities between the two systems, for instance with regard to the role of third-party funders, the debate between ensuring freedom of speech and leveling the electoral playing field, and the importance of transparency, not only in law but also in practice.
本文通过制度性腐败的视角来研究英国的政治金融问题。它介绍了两个核心原则,支出限制和透明度,这是英国当前围绕政治融资的立法的基础。然后,它讨论了捐赠上限的可能性,这是英国政府公共生活标准委员会(Committee on Standards in Public Life)建议的。最后,它反映了工会,媒体和其他第三方的作用,作为英国机构的一个方面,这与机构腐败的主题特别相关。通过对英国政治金融体系的简要概述,可以看出,制度腐败的概念与英国的背景和美国的背景一样相关。尽管存在差异,特别是在不同利益相关者的具体作用方面,但很明显,这两个制度之间存在相似之处,例如第三方资助者的作用,确保言论自由与公平选举环境之间的辩论,以及透明度的重要性,不仅在法律上,而且在实践中。