Does transmission technology influence acceptance of overhead power lines? An empirical study

B. Zaunbrecher, M. Stieneker, R. D. Doncker, M. Ziefle
{"title":"Does transmission technology influence acceptance of overhead power lines? An empirical study","authors":"B. Zaunbrecher, M. Stieneker, R. D. Doncker, M. Ziefle","doi":"10.5220/0005802801890200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the transmission of electricity across long distances, high voltage direct current (DC) transmission is discussed in Germany as an alternative to the currently used alternating current (AC) as it is more efficient for these distances. Changes in energy infrastructure are known to raise public awareness. However, little is known whether differences in transmission technology are relevant for the public and if so, to what extent. Two consecutive empirical studies were run in which acceptance towards transmission lines operated with DC in contrast to AC was explored. AC and DC power lines were not evaluated differently, yielding overall quite neutral ratings (Study 1) which might be due to a low information level in the public. A closer look (Study 2) showed that giving information on technical and design parameters of the transmission lines used for either AC or DC technology also did not change attitudes substantially. It is therefore concluded that transmission technology alone did not influence acceptance of power lines for the investigated sample. In addition, a need for more information on DC for high voltage transmission was identified. Further research is required on the influence of different power line layout of AC and DC on acceptance.","PeriodicalId":448232,"journal":{"name":"2016 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (SMARTGREENS)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (SMARTGREENS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005802801890200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

For the transmission of electricity across long distances, high voltage direct current (DC) transmission is discussed in Germany as an alternative to the currently used alternating current (AC) as it is more efficient for these distances. Changes in energy infrastructure are known to raise public awareness. However, little is known whether differences in transmission technology are relevant for the public and if so, to what extent. Two consecutive empirical studies were run in which acceptance towards transmission lines operated with DC in contrast to AC was explored. AC and DC power lines were not evaluated differently, yielding overall quite neutral ratings (Study 1) which might be due to a low information level in the public. A closer look (Study 2) showed that giving information on technical and design parameters of the transmission lines used for either AC or DC technology also did not change attitudes substantially. It is therefore concluded that transmission technology alone did not influence acceptance of power lines for the investigated sample. In addition, a need for more information on DC for high voltage transmission was identified. Further research is required on the influence of different power line layout of AC and DC on acceptance.
输电技术是否影响架空电力线路的验收?实证研究
对于长距离的电力传输,德国讨论了高压直流(DC)传输作为目前使用的交流电(AC)的替代方案,因为它在这些距离上更有效。众所周知,能源基础设施的变化可以提高公众的意识。然而,很少有人知道传输技术的差异是否与公众相关,如果是,在多大程度上与公众相关。连续进行了两项实证研究,其中探讨了与交流相比,人们对直流输电线路的接受程度。交流和直流电力线的评估没有区别,总体上得出相当中性的评级(研究1),这可能是由于公众的信息水平较低。仔细观察(研究2)表明,提供交流或直流技术使用的输电线路的技术和设计参数的信息也没有实质性地改变态度。因此得出结论,输电技术本身并不影响所调查样品的电力线路验收。此外,还确定需要更多关于高压输电直流的信息。交直流不同电源线布放方式对验收的影响有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信