{"title":"A New Approach to the Duo-Factor-Model of Return and Volume","authors":"M. Cremers, J. Mei","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.303287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces a recently developed consistent statistic by Bai and Ng (2002) to determine the number of factors in an approximate multifactor model. We use this new approach to study a recent work by Lo and Wang (2000), which shows that a multifactor asset-pricing model not only imposes factor restrictions on stock returns but on trading volume as well. We explicitly test their theoretical model restriction using individual stock and turnover data from NYSE and AMEX from 1962 to 1996. While we find that the duo-factor model captures a great deal of common variation of return and trading volume, the data rejects a model restriction that excess return and turnover have the same number of systematic factors. We decompose excess return and turnover into systematic and idiosyncratic components. We discover a significant increase in the variation of idiosyncratic turnover through time, analogous to the finding of a notable increase in firm-specific volatility by Campbell, Lettau, Malkiel and Xu (2001). We also find significant co-movements between volatility and turnover at the systematic levels. Our findings support the view that trading volume is not purely random but driven by trading activities associated with macroeconomic and firm news.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.303287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
This paper introduces a recently developed consistent statistic by Bai and Ng (2002) to determine the number of factors in an approximate multifactor model. We use this new approach to study a recent work by Lo and Wang (2000), which shows that a multifactor asset-pricing model not only imposes factor restrictions on stock returns but on trading volume as well. We explicitly test their theoretical model restriction using individual stock and turnover data from NYSE and AMEX from 1962 to 1996. While we find that the duo-factor model captures a great deal of common variation of return and trading volume, the data rejects a model restriction that excess return and turnover have the same number of systematic factors. We decompose excess return and turnover into systematic and idiosyncratic components. We discover a significant increase in the variation of idiosyncratic turnover through time, analogous to the finding of a notable increase in firm-specific volatility by Campbell, Lettau, Malkiel and Xu (2001). We also find significant co-movements between volatility and turnover at the systematic levels. Our findings support the view that trading volume is not purely random but driven by trading activities associated with macroeconomic and firm news.