The Mukachevo Basilian hegumen, historian, and writer Anatolii Kralytskyi’s OSBM (1835–1894) activity for popularizing of Mykola Kostomarov’s heritage

34 Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.26565/2227-6505-2022-34-03
V. Moroz
{"title":"The Mukachevo Basilian hegumen, historian, and writer Anatolii Kralytskyi’s OSBM (1835–1894) activity for popularizing of Mykola Kostomarov’s heritage","authors":"V. Moroz","doi":"10.26565/2227-6505-2022-34-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aim is to investigate knowledge of Mykola Kostomarov’s works by Fr Anatolii Kralytskyi, a historian, ethnographer, journalist, writer, and hegumen at the Mukachevo Basilian monastery in 1869–1894. The author analyses Kralytskyi’s learning of Kostomarov’s ideas and describes hegumen’s activity in popularizing them.\n\nResearch methodology. The article uses the methods of intellectual history to discuss Kostomarov’s heritage influence on Kralytskyi, the prominent historian and journalist of the Basilian Order of St. Josaphat and the Mukachevo Eparchy in the second part of the XIX century.\n\nScientific novelty. For the first time in historiography, Volodymyr Moroz compares the works of Kostomarov and Kralytskyi with insights into the Basilian intellectual activity to describe his learning ideas of the outstanding historian. The author defines Kralytskyi’s appreciation of Kostomarov’s heritage and his work to transmit some\n\nConclusions. The author found that Anatolii Kralytskyi could read works and learn the ideas of Mykola Kostomarov concerning Ukrainian history and the national question. Firstly, the monk published his texts in the periodical literature of Galicia already in the early 1860s, where Kostomarov’s texts were simultaneously published. For the second, in 1875, Kralytskyi received a set of Kostomarov’s books from Mykhailo Drahomanov. Kostomarov’s arguments had become so attractive to Basilian that he publicly declared Kostomarov was the most significant historian of his time. The article ascertains that Kralytskyi used Kostomarov’s ideas to strengthen his arguments. He did so while being included in transmitting the Ukrainian population from the archaic “Old-Ruthenian” identity to the new one. At the same time, the author explains, these significant changes included a Russophillian stage in the Galicia and Zakarpattia.","PeriodicalId":438406,"journal":{"name":"34","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"34","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-6505-2022-34-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research aim is to investigate knowledge of Mykola Kostomarov’s works by Fr Anatolii Kralytskyi, a historian, ethnographer, journalist, writer, and hegumen at the Mukachevo Basilian monastery in 1869–1894. The author analyses Kralytskyi’s learning of Kostomarov’s ideas and describes hegumen’s activity in popularizing them. Research methodology. The article uses the methods of intellectual history to discuss Kostomarov’s heritage influence on Kralytskyi, the prominent historian and journalist of the Basilian Order of St. Josaphat and the Mukachevo Eparchy in the second part of the XIX century. Scientific novelty. For the first time in historiography, Volodymyr Moroz compares the works of Kostomarov and Kralytskyi with insights into the Basilian intellectual activity to describe his learning ideas of the outstanding historian. The author defines Kralytskyi’s appreciation of Kostomarov’s heritage and his work to transmit some Conclusions. The author found that Anatolii Kralytskyi could read works and learn the ideas of Mykola Kostomarov concerning Ukrainian history and the national question. Firstly, the monk published his texts in the periodical literature of Galicia already in the early 1860s, where Kostomarov’s texts were simultaneously published. For the second, in 1875, Kralytskyi received a set of Kostomarov’s books from Mykhailo Drahomanov. Kostomarov’s arguments had become so attractive to Basilian that he publicly declared Kostomarov was the most significant historian of his time. The article ascertains that Kralytskyi used Kostomarov’s ideas to strengthen his arguments. He did so while being included in transmitting the Ukrainian population from the archaic “Old-Ruthenian” identity to the new one. At the same time, the author explains, these significant changes included a Russophillian stage in the Galicia and Zakarpattia.
Mukachevo Basilian hegumen,历史学家和作家Anatolii Kralytskyi的OSBM(1835-1894)活动,以普及尼古拉·科斯托马罗夫的遗产
这项研究的目的是调查1869年至1894年穆卡切沃巴西利安修道院的历史学家、民族志学家、记者、作家和修道士阿纳托利·克拉利茨基神父对尼古拉·科斯托马罗夫作品的了解。作者分析了克拉利茨基对科斯托马罗夫思想的学习,并描述了他在推广这些思想方面的活动。研究方法。本文运用思想史的方法,探讨了科斯托马罗夫对十九世纪下半叶巴西连圣约萨法特骑士团和穆卡切沃骑士团的著名历史学家和记者克拉利茨基的遗产影响。科学的新奇。在史学中,Volodymyr Moroz第一次将Kostomarov和Kralytskyi的作品与对巴西人智力活动的洞察进行了比较,以描述他对杰出历史学家的学习理念。作者定义了克拉利茨基对科斯托马罗夫遗产的欣赏及其作品,以传达一些结论。作者发现Anatolii Kralytskyi可以阅读作品并学习Mykola Kostomarov关于乌克兰历史和民族问题的观点。首先,这位修道士早在19世纪60年代初就在加利西亚的期刊文学上发表了他的文章,与此同时,科斯托马罗夫的文章也在那里发表。第二次是在1875年,克拉利茨基从米哈伊洛·德拉哈马诺夫那里收到了一套科斯托马罗夫的书。科斯托马罗夫的观点对巴西连来说非常有吸引力,以至于他公开宣称科斯托马罗夫是他那个时代最重要的历史学家。本文确定了克拉利茨基利用科斯托马罗夫的观点来加强他的论点。他这样做的同时,还参与了将乌克兰人口从古老的“老鲁塞尼亚”身份转移到新身份的工作。同时,作者解释说,这些重大变化包括在加利西亚和扎卡尔帕蒂亚的俄罗斯阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
34
34
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信