F.M. Dostoevsky’s Prophetism in the Theological Conceptions of V.S. Solovyov and M.M. Tareev

A. Makarova
{"title":"F.M. Dostoevsky’s Prophetism in the Theological Conceptions of V.S. Solovyov and M.M. Tareev","authors":"A. Makarova","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.2.169-178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article compares the interpretations of the prophetic role of F.M. Dostoevsky, proposed by the philosopher V.S. Solovyov and the theologian M.M. Tareev. The method of comparison between the writer and the prophet, which came from the literary tradition of romanticism, is transferred to the sphere of cultural studies and religious thought. The article analyzes the works of V.S. Solovyov “Three speeches in memory of Dostoevsky” and M.M. Tareev “Dostoevsky as a religious thinker to clarify the interpretations of the prophetic function of the writer proposed in these texts, other texts of these authors are involved, revealing in more detail their ideas about the place and tasks of the prophet in the New Testament time and about possible carriers of this function in modern the church community. The article attempts to show that the discrepancies in the assessments of the prophetic role of F.M. Dostoevsky between V.S. Solovyov and M.M. Tareev are partly due to their ideas of the relationship between Christianity and culture. (Thus, the limitation of Dostoevsky to the framework of national Christianity, noted by M.M. Tareev, which makes it possible to compare him with the Old Testament prophets, is explained by the idea of the impossibility of combining the religious-moral and cultural-historical spheres in the theological writings of M.M. Tareev). The views of thinkers on the person being able to perform the function of prophet in the modern church community are also examined.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.2.169-178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article compares the interpretations of the prophetic role of F.M. Dostoevsky, proposed by the philosopher V.S. Solovyov and the theologian M.M. Tareev. The method of comparison between the writer and the prophet, which came from the literary tradition of romanticism, is transferred to the sphere of cultural studies and religious thought. The article analyzes the works of V.S. Solovyov “Three speeches in memory of Dostoevsky” and M.M. Tareev “Dostoevsky as a religious thinker to clarify the interpretations of the prophetic function of the writer proposed in these texts, other texts of these authors are involved, revealing in more detail their ideas about the place and tasks of the prophet in the New Testament time and about possible carriers of this function in modern the church community. The article attempts to show that the discrepancies in the assessments of the prophetic role of F.M. Dostoevsky between V.S. Solovyov and M.M. Tareev are partly due to their ideas of the relationship between Christianity and culture. (Thus, the limitation of Dostoevsky to the framework of national Christianity, noted by M.M. Tareev, which makes it possible to compare him with the Old Testament prophets, is explained by the idea of the impossibility of combining the religious-moral and cultural-historical spheres in the theological writings of M.M. Tareev). The views of thinkers on the person being able to perform the function of prophet in the modern church community are also examined.
索洛维约夫和塔列耶夫神学观念中的陀思妥耶夫斯基的预言
本文比较了哲学家索洛维约夫和神学家塔列耶夫对陀思妥耶夫斯基先知角色的解读。作家与先知之间的比较方法,来自浪漫主义的文学传统,被转移到文化研究和宗教思想的领域。本文通过对索洛维约夫的《纪念陀思妥耶夫斯基的三篇演讲》和塔列耶夫的《陀思妥耶夫斯基作为宗教思想家的三篇演讲》的分析,阐明了作者在这些文本中提出的先知功能的解释,并涉及了这些作者的其他文本,更详细地揭示了他们对先知在新约时代的地位和任务的看法,以及在现代教会社会中这种功能的可能载体。索洛维约夫和塔列耶夫对陀思妥耶夫斯基先知角色的评价之所以存在差异,部分原因在于他们对基督教与文化关系的看法。(因此,M.M. Tareev注意到陀思妥耶夫斯基局限于民族基督教的框架,这使得他有可能与旧约先知进行比较,这可以用M.M. Tareev的神学著作中不可能将宗教-道德和文化-历史领域结合起来的观点来解释)。本文还考察了思想家们对现代教会团体中能够发挥先知功能的人的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信