{"title":"Stats, Social Justice, and the Limits of Interest Convergence: The Story of Tucson Unified’s Mexican American Studies Litigation","authors":"Nolan L. Cabrera, R. Chang","doi":"10.24974/amae.13.3.453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2011, the state of Arizona banned the highly successful Tucson Unified School District Mexican American Studies program through the law ARS § 15-112. This article is a Critical Race Theory counternarrative regarding the role of statistics in the constitutional challenge to this state law. Through firsthand accounts of this process, we demonstrate how multivariate empirical analyses served as an important component for the overturning of the law ARS § 15-112 in the highest-profile Ethnic Studies legal case in the country’s history ( Arce v. Douglas , 2015). We also use this article to explore the limitations of interest convergence (Bell, 1980) using this litigation as a case study.","PeriodicalId":414867,"journal":{"name":"Association of Mexican American Educators Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Association of Mexican American Educators Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24974/amae.13.3.453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In 2011, the state of Arizona banned the highly successful Tucson Unified School District Mexican American Studies program through the law ARS § 15-112. This article is a Critical Race Theory counternarrative regarding the role of statistics in the constitutional challenge to this state law. Through firsthand accounts of this process, we demonstrate how multivariate empirical analyses served as an important component for the overturning of the law ARS § 15-112 in the highest-profile Ethnic Studies legal case in the country’s history ( Arce v. Douglas , 2015). We also use this article to explore the limitations of interest convergence (Bell, 1980) using this litigation as a case study.
2011年,亚利桑那州通过ARS§15-112禁止了非常成功的图森联合学区墨西哥裔美国人研究项目。这篇文章是一篇批判种族理论的反叙事,关于统计数据在对这一州法律的宪法挑战中的作用。通过对这一过程的第一手描述,我们展示了多元实证分析如何在该国历史上最引人注目的种族研究法律案件(Arce v. Douglas, 2015)中成为推翻ARS§15-112法律的重要组成部分。我们还利用这篇文章来探讨利益趋同的局限性(Bell, 1980),并将这一诉讼作为案例研究。