Analysis Procedure of Inspection Errors Based on MSA Attribute Study Data Set for the Improvement Purposes: Part 1 – Methodolodgy

K. Knop
{"title":"Analysis Procedure of Inspection Errors Based on MSA Attribute Study Data Set for the Improvement Purposes: Part 1 – Methodolodgy","authors":"K. Knop","doi":"10.2478/cqpi-2020-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article presents an authorship version of the analysis procedure of data set from MSA Attribute Study for the purposes related to the reduction of conformity assessment errors and improvement of production process effectiveness. The MSA manual does not include any clear guidelines on how to eliminate errors or guidelines on how to analyse data sets from attribute study to eliminate errors. The article attempts to fill the gap identified in this field. In this article (Part 1), the author outlines the key features of own methodology of analysis data from MSA attribute study. In this article, which is one of the two parts, a research problem has been identified. It was emphasised that the influence on the reduction of the effectiveness of the production process have errors committed by the controllers in the alternative assessment of the product’s conformity with the requirements, i.e. errors of I and II type, in particular, II type errors, which should be first eliminated. A traditional approach to research analysis and evaluation of alternative inspection system practised in the MSA manual was presented. Four key assumptions that were adopted for the research goal were presented. Author’s procedure for analysis of errors from the attribute study data set is to point to the direction of activities in the field of error analysis, emphasise intolerance to any error, assume to use the root causes analysis and the coaching sessions to reach the root causes of conformity errors. In the second, final article in the series (Part 2), the author illustrates how, step by step, the procedure could be used in practice. It also presents the advantages and limitations of its own procedure.","PeriodicalId":166707,"journal":{"name":"Conference Quality Production Improvement – CQPI","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Quality Production Improvement – CQPI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cqpi-2020-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article presents an authorship version of the analysis procedure of data set from MSA Attribute Study for the purposes related to the reduction of conformity assessment errors and improvement of production process effectiveness. The MSA manual does not include any clear guidelines on how to eliminate errors or guidelines on how to analyse data sets from attribute study to eliminate errors. The article attempts to fill the gap identified in this field. In this article (Part 1), the author outlines the key features of own methodology of analysis data from MSA attribute study. In this article, which is one of the two parts, a research problem has been identified. It was emphasised that the influence on the reduction of the effectiveness of the production process have errors committed by the controllers in the alternative assessment of the product’s conformity with the requirements, i.e. errors of I and II type, in particular, II type errors, which should be first eliminated. A traditional approach to research analysis and evaluation of alternative inspection system practised in the MSA manual was presented. Four key assumptions that were adopted for the research goal were presented. Author’s procedure for analysis of errors from the attribute study data set is to point to the direction of activities in the field of error analysis, emphasise intolerance to any error, assume to use the root causes analysis and the coaching sessions to reach the root causes of conformity errors. In the second, final article in the series (Part 2), the author illustrates how, step by step, the procedure could be used in practice. It also presents the advantages and limitations of its own procedure.
以改进为目的的基于MSA属性研究数据集的检验误差分析程序:第1部分-方法
摘要本文以减少合格评定错误和提高生产过程有效性为目的,提出了MSA属性研究数据集分析程序的作者版本。MSA手册不包括任何关于如何消除错误的明确指导,也不包括关于如何从属性研究中分析数据集以消除错误的指导。本文试图填补这一领域的空白。在本文(第1部分)中,作者概述了自己的MSA属性研究数据分析方法的主要特点。在本文中,这是两部分中的一部分,已经确定了一个研究问题。有人强调,对降低生产过程有效性的影响是控制者在对产品是否符合要求的替代评估中所犯的错误,即第一类和第二类错误,特别是第二类错误,应首先消除。介绍了一种传统的方法来研究、分析和评价MSA手册中实施的替代检测系统。提出了研究目标所采用的四个关键假设。作者从属性研究数据集中分析错误的程序是指出错误分析领域的活动方向,强调对任何错误的不容忍,假设使用根本原因分析和指导会议来达到一致性错误的根本原因。在本系列的最后一篇文章(第2部分)中,作者将逐步说明如何在实践中使用该过程。并介绍了自己的程序的优点和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信