The Relationship between Firm Market Power and Audit Fee Decisions

Ilhang Shin
{"title":"The Relationship between Firm Market Power and Audit Fee Decisions","authors":"Ilhang Shin","doi":"10.16980/JITC.14.3.201806.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzed the relationship between firm market power and audit fee decision. Specifically, the impact of the market power measured by market share on audit fee was determined, and also the impact of the company’s governance structure on the relationship between market power and audit fee was analyzed. This paper finds that firm market power is positively related to audit fee. This result is pronounced for firms with good corporate governance. Specifically, results are summarized as follows. First, there is a positive relationship between market power and audit fee. Second, the largest shareholder mitigates the positive relationship between market power and audit fee. Third, foreign investors strengthen the positive relationship between market power and audit fee. The contributions of the study are as follows. First, this study systematically examined the relationship between market power and audit fee that were rarely highlighted in the preceding studies. Second, this study provides a systematic and expanded view of the impact of corporate governance on audit quality. Third, this study offers the stakeholders in the capital market with insights from implications that express the necessity of utilizing the company’s competitive status and information in order to evaluate the reliability of the company’s financial statements.","PeriodicalId":117141,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Corporate Governance (Emerging Markets Economics) (Topic)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Corporate Governance (Emerging Markets Economics) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16980/JITC.14.3.201806.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study analyzed the relationship between firm market power and audit fee decision. Specifically, the impact of the market power measured by market share on audit fee was determined, and also the impact of the company’s governance structure on the relationship between market power and audit fee was analyzed. This paper finds that firm market power is positively related to audit fee. This result is pronounced for firms with good corporate governance. Specifically, results are summarized as follows. First, there is a positive relationship between market power and audit fee. Second, the largest shareholder mitigates the positive relationship between market power and audit fee. Third, foreign investors strengthen the positive relationship between market power and audit fee. The contributions of the study are as follows. First, this study systematically examined the relationship between market power and audit fee that were rarely highlighted in the preceding studies. Second, this study provides a systematic and expanded view of the impact of corporate governance on audit quality. Third, this study offers the stakeholders in the capital market with insights from implications that express the necessity of utilizing the company’s competitive status and information in order to evaluate the reliability of the company’s financial statements.
企业市场支配力与审计费用决策的关系
本文分析了企业市场支配力与审计费用决策之间的关系。具体而言,确定了以市场份额衡量的市场势力对审计费用的影响,并分析了公司治理结构对市场势力与审计费用关系的影响。研究发现,企业市场支配力与审计费用呈正相关。这一结果在公司治理良好的公司中尤为明显。具体而言,结果总结如下。首先,市场势力与审计费用之间存在正相关关系。第二,第一大股东削弱了市场支配力与审计费用之间的正相关关系。第三,外国投资者加强了市场势力与审计费用之间的正相关关系。本研究的贡献如下:首先,本研究系统地考察了市场支配力与审计费用之间的关系,这在以往的研究中很少得到重视。其次,本研究对公司治理对审计质量的影响提供了一个系统和扩展的视角。第三,本研究为资本市场的利益相关者提供了深刻的见解,这些见解表达了利用公司竞争地位和信息来评估公司财务报表可靠性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信