An atomistic interpretation of Planck's 1900 derivation of his radiation law.

F. Irons
{"title":"An atomistic interpretation of Planck's 1900 derivation of his radiation law.","authors":"F. Irons","doi":"10.1071/PH99063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In deriving his radiation law in 1900, Max Planck employed a simple harmonic oscillator to model the exchange of energy between radiation and matter. Traditionally the harmonic oscillator has been viewed as modelling an entity which is itself oscillating, although a suitable oscillating entity has not been forthcoming. (Opinion is divided between a material oscillator, an imaginary oscillator and a need to revise Planck\"s derivation to apply to cavity modes of oscillation). We offer a novel, atomistic interpretation of Planck\"s derivation wherein the harmonic oscillator models a transition between the internal quantum states of an atom|not a normal electronic atom characterised by possible energies 0 and hv, but an atom populated by subatomic bosons (such as pions) and characterised by multiple occupancy of quantum states and possible energies nhv (n= 0;1;2; :::). We show how Planck\"s derivation can be varied to accommodate electronic atoms. A corollary to the atomistic interpretation is that Planck\"s derivation can no longer be construed as support for the postulate that material oscillating entities can have only those energies that are multiples of hv.","PeriodicalId":170873,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PH99063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

In deriving his radiation law in 1900, Max Planck employed a simple harmonic oscillator to model the exchange of energy between radiation and matter. Traditionally the harmonic oscillator has been viewed as modelling an entity which is itself oscillating, although a suitable oscillating entity has not been forthcoming. (Opinion is divided between a material oscillator, an imaginary oscillator and a need to revise Planck"s derivation to apply to cavity modes of oscillation). We offer a novel, atomistic interpretation of Planck"s derivation wherein the harmonic oscillator models a transition between the internal quantum states of an atom|not a normal electronic atom characterised by possible energies 0 and hv, but an atom populated by subatomic bosons (such as pions) and characterised by multiple occupancy of quantum states and possible energies nhv (n= 0;1;2; :::). We show how Planck"s derivation can be varied to accommodate electronic atoms. A corollary to the atomistic interpretation is that Planck"s derivation can no longer be construed as support for the postulate that material oscillating entities can have only those energies that are multiples of hv.
普朗克1900年对他的辐射定律的推导的原子解释。
在1900年推导出他的辐射定律时,马克斯·普朗克使用了一个简单的谐振子来模拟辐射和物质之间的能量交换。传统上,谐振子被看作是模拟一个本身振荡的实体,尽管合适的振荡实体尚未出现。(意见分为物质振子、虚振子和需要修正普朗克的推导以适用于振荡的腔模式)。我们对普朗克的推导提供了一种新颖的原子论解释,其中谐振子模拟了原子内部量子态之间的跃迁——不是一个以可能能量0和hv为特征的普通电子原子,而是一个由亚原子玻色子(如介子)填充的原子,其特征是量子态和可能能量nhv (n= 0;1;2;:::)。我们展示了如何改变普朗克的推导以适应电子原子。原子解释的一个必然结果是,普朗克的推导不能再被解释为支持物质振荡实体只能具有几倍于hv的能量这一假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信