ON CONSIDERING INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN RHETORIC AND ARGUMENTOLOGY

L. G. Vasilev
{"title":"ON CONSIDERING INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN RHETORIC AND ARGUMENTOLOGY","authors":"L. G. Vasilev","doi":"10.35634/2412-9534-2022-32-4-736-741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the problem of basic constitutive features of the two central verbal-influence paradygms, rhetorical and argumentological, with the emphasis on peculiarities of the former. General-methodological features of rhetoric and of different grounds for its consideration are discussed. Extensional and intensional sides of rhetoric are singled out. Rhetoric is also considered in view of mental efforts applied so that its reflexive and non-reflexive variants could be differentiated. Grounds for regarding rhetoric as a subdivision of argumentation are also given.","PeriodicalId":343725,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series History and Philology","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series History and Philology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9534-2022-32-4-736-741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the problem of basic constitutive features of the two central verbal-influence paradygms, rhetorical and argumentological, with the emphasis on peculiarities of the former. General-methodological features of rhetoric and of different grounds for its consideration are discussed. Extensional and intensional sides of rhetoric are singled out. Rhetoric is also considered in view of mental efforts applied so that its reflexive and non-reflexive variants could be differentiated. Grounds for regarding rhetoric as a subdivision of argumentation are also given.
论修辞学与议论文学的相互关系
本文讨论了两种主要的语言影响范式——修辞学范式和论证范式的基本构成特征问题,重点讨论了修辞学范式的特点。本文讨论了修辞学的一般方法特点和修辞学研究的不同依据。修辞学的外延和内蕴都被挑了出来。修辞学也考虑到运用心理努力,以区分其反身和非反身变体。并给出了将修辞学作为论证的一个分支的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信