Selective attention to emotional prosody in social anxiety: a dichotic listening study

Virginie Peschard, E. Gilboa-Schechtman, P. Philippot
{"title":"Selective attention to emotional prosody in social anxiety: a dichotic listening study","authors":"Virginie Peschard, E. Gilboa-Schechtman, P. Philippot","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2016.1261012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The majority of evidence on social anxiety (SA)-linked attentional biases to threat comes from research using facial expressions. Emotions are, however, communicated through other channels, such as voice. Despite its importance in the interpretation of social cues, emotional prosody processing in SA has been barely explored. This study investigated whether SA is associated with enhanced processing of task-irrelevant angry prosody. Fifty-three participants with high and low SA performed a dichotic listening task in which pairs of male/female voices were presented, one to each ear, with either the same or different prosody (neutral or angry). Participants were instructed to focus on either the left or right ear and to identify the speaker’s gender in the attended side. Our main results show that, once attended, task-irrelevant angry prosody elicits greater interference than does neutral prosody. Surprisingly, high socially anxious participants were less prone to distraction from attended-angry (compared to attended-neutral) prosody than were low socially anxious individuals. These findings emphasise the importance of examining SA-related biases across modalities.","PeriodicalId":128345,"journal":{"name":"Cognition and Emotion","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition and Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1261012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT The majority of evidence on social anxiety (SA)-linked attentional biases to threat comes from research using facial expressions. Emotions are, however, communicated through other channels, such as voice. Despite its importance in the interpretation of social cues, emotional prosody processing in SA has been barely explored. This study investigated whether SA is associated with enhanced processing of task-irrelevant angry prosody. Fifty-three participants with high and low SA performed a dichotic listening task in which pairs of male/female voices were presented, one to each ear, with either the same or different prosody (neutral or angry). Participants were instructed to focus on either the left or right ear and to identify the speaker’s gender in the attended side. Our main results show that, once attended, task-irrelevant angry prosody elicits greater interference than does neutral prosody. Surprisingly, high socially anxious participants were less prone to distraction from attended-angry (compared to attended-neutral) prosody than were low socially anxious individuals. These findings emphasise the importance of examining SA-related biases across modalities.
社交焦虑对情绪韵律的选择性注意:一项二元听力研究
大多数关于社交焦虑(SA)与威胁注意偏差相关的证据来自面部表情研究。然而,情绪是通过其他渠道交流的,比如声音。尽管情绪韵律加工在社会线索的解释中很重要,但它在SA中的研究却很少。本研究探讨了SA是否与任务无关的愤怒韵律加工增强有关。53名高SA和低SA的参与者进行了一项双重听力任务,在这项任务中,他们向每只耳朵分别播放了两组韵律相同或不同的男性/女性声音(中性或愤怒)。参与者被要求将注意力集中在左耳或右耳上,并在倾听的一侧识别说话者的性别。我们的主要结果表明,一旦参与,与任务无关的愤怒韵律比中性韵律引起更大的干扰。令人惊讶的是,高社交焦虑的参与者比低社交焦虑的参与者更不容易被参与的愤怒韵律(与参与的中性韵律相比)分散注意力。这些发现强调了跨模式检查sa相关偏差的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信