{"title":"Treatment of Indianness and Indian Lexical Items in the Poetry of Jayanta Mahapatra","authors":"Hemanta Rajbanshi, Dr. Bairagi Patra","doi":"10.20431/2347-3134.0801004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we try to focus the issue of Indianness and the Indian lexical items used by Jayanta Mahapatra from a socio-cultural and linguistic point of view. The issue of Indianness reflected in the works of Indian English literature is a much discussed and debated topic among the high brow people. It is often seen that the Indian writers, whether poets or novelists or any prose writers, are conscious enough about their Indian identity. According to Meenakshi Mukharjee, this tendency is nothing but an „anxiety of Indianness‟. For Gokak, “It is easy to slip into thinking that Indianness consists in adopting an angle of vision which is recognizably vedantic” (Gokak in Mohan, 1978, p.23). Besides this vedantic view, however, as he argues, there are other world views too presented by Indian literature. These areMarxist, socialist, existentialists etc. According to Gokak, mysticism is an important feature found in the Indian literature which is a very common theme found in other literatures too. He says, “An expression of occult experience is not the monopoly of Indo-Anglican or Indian writers. Blake and the romantics and the poets of the Irish revival like A.E. Houseman and W. B. Yeats are full of it.This too, is a feature which distinguishes the work of all great writers in world literature”(Gokak in Mohan, 1978,pp.23-24).","PeriodicalId":137524,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.0801004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, we try to focus the issue of Indianness and the Indian lexical items used by Jayanta Mahapatra from a socio-cultural and linguistic point of view. The issue of Indianness reflected in the works of Indian English literature is a much discussed and debated topic among the high brow people. It is often seen that the Indian writers, whether poets or novelists or any prose writers, are conscious enough about their Indian identity. According to Meenakshi Mukharjee, this tendency is nothing but an „anxiety of Indianness‟. For Gokak, “It is easy to slip into thinking that Indianness consists in adopting an angle of vision which is recognizably vedantic” (Gokak in Mohan, 1978, p.23). Besides this vedantic view, however, as he argues, there are other world views too presented by Indian literature. These areMarxist, socialist, existentialists etc. According to Gokak, mysticism is an important feature found in the Indian literature which is a very common theme found in other literatures too. He says, “An expression of occult experience is not the monopoly of Indo-Anglican or Indian writers. Blake and the romantics and the poets of the Irish revival like A.E. Houseman and W. B. Yeats are full of it.This too, is a feature which distinguishes the work of all great writers in world literature”(Gokak in Mohan, 1978,pp.23-24).
在本研究中,我们试图从社会文化和语言的角度来关注Jayanta Mahapatra使用的印度性和印度词汇问题。在印度英语文学作品中反映的印度性问题是一个备受高知识分子讨论和争论的话题。我们经常看到,印度作家,无论是诗人、小说家还是散文家,都对自己的印度身份有足够的意识。根据米纳克什·穆哈吉的说法,这种趋势只不过是一种“对印度性的焦虑”。对于Gokak来说,“很容易陷入这样的想法,即印度性在于采用一种可识别的吠陀视角”(Gokak in Mohan, 1978,第23页)。然而,正如他所说,除了这种吠檀多的观点之外,印度文学还呈现了其他世界观。他们是马克思主义者、社会主义者、存在主义者等等。根据Gokak的说法,神秘主义是印度文学的一个重要特征,也是其他文学中非常常见的主题。他说,对神秘体验的表达并不是印度圣公会或印度作家的专利。布莱克、浪漫主义者和爱尔兰复兴诗人,如A.E.豪斯曼和w.b.叶芝,都充满了这种情绪。这也是世界文学史上所有伟大作家作品的特点”(Gokak in Mohan, 1978,pp.23-24)。