The Imperative for Community-Driven Approaches and Radical Inclusion

{"title":"The Imperative for Community-Driven Approaches and Radical Inclusion","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190080495.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter argues that what well-being means must be articulated at the grassroots level, rather than imposed by experts or governments. People in communities already have the answers to what well-being means to them. It is embedded in the wisdom traditions and the lived experiences, aspirations, hopes, and values of people all over the world. Instead of assuming that leaders will bring the well-being agenda to communities, leaders should instead look at what is happening already and build on what communities are already doing. Additionally, a benefit of engaging communities, people, and organizations as true partners in the work of defining well-being is that this engagement is a starting point for fostering grassroots demand for the implementation of a shared well-being agenda. At the same time, it is critical to practice radical inclusion and ensure that people from communities that are often—and have historically been—excluded from meaningful input and decision-making are engaged and contribute to an understanding of what well-being means. In addition to indigenous communities and racial or ethnic groups, this may include those who are living in poverty, experiencing homelessness, incarcerated, and struggling with substance abuse.","PeriodicalId":262438,"journal":{"name":"Well-Being: Expanding the Definition of Progress","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Well-Being: Expanding the Definition of Progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190080495.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter argues that what well-being means must be articulated at the grassroots level, rather than imposed by experts or governments. People in communities already have the answers to what well-being means to them. It is embedded in the wisdom traditions and the lived experiences, aspirations, hopes, and values of people all over the world. Instead of assuming that leaders will bring the well-being agenda to communities, leaders should instead look at what is happening already and build on what communities are already doing. Additionally, a benefit of engaging communities, people, and organizations as true partners in the work of defining well-being is that this engagement is a starting point for fostering grassroots demand for the implementation of a shared well-being agenda. At the same time, it is critical to practice radical inclusion and ensure that people from communities that are often—and have historically been—excluded from meaningful input and decision-making are engaged and contribute to an understanding of what well-being means. In addition to indigenous communities and racial or ethnic groups, this may include those who are living in poverty, experiencing homelessness, incarcerated, and struggling with substance abuse.
社区驱动的方法和激进包容的必要性
本章认为,福祉的含义必须在基层明确表达,而不是由专家或政府强加。社区中的人们已经知道幸福对他们意味着什么。它植根于世界各地人民的智慧传统和生活经验、愿望、希望和价值观中。与其假设领导者会将福祉议程带到社区,领导者应该看看已经发生的事情,并以社区已经在做的事情为基础。此外,在定义福祉的工作中,让社区、人民和组织作为真正的合作伙伴参与的一个好处是,这种参与是促进基层对实施共享福祉议程的需求的起点。与此同时,至关重要的是要实行激进的包容,并确保那些经常(而且历史上一直被排除在有意义的投入和决策之外的社区的人们参与进来,并为理解福祉的含义做出贡献。除了土著社区和种族或族裔群体外,这可能还包括那些生活贫困、无家可归、被监禁和与药物滥用作斗争的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信