Scintigraphic evaluation of duodenogastric reflux: significance in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis.

A H Elgazzar, M Fernandez-Ulloa, J R Ryan, R McDevitt, S A Daya, H R Maxon
{"title":"Scintigraphic evaluation of duodenogastric reflux: significance in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis.","authors":"A H Elgazzar,&nbsp;M Fernandez-Ulloa,&nbsp;J R Ryan,&nbsp;R McDevitt,&nbsp;S A Daya,&nbsp;H R Maxon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Duodenogastric reflux (DGR) as seen on hepatobiliary scintigraphy has been reported as a useful secondary sign for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. We evaluated the association of reflux with cases of acute cholecystitis as compared to those with chronic cholecystitis or other conditions. Thirty-six of 198 patients referred for hepatobiliary imaging showed DGR (18%). Among 26 patients with acute cholecystitis, 6 (23%) had DGR as compared to 9/40 (23%) cases with chronic cholecystitis, 3/12 cases with acute pancreatitis, 4/13 cases with previous cholecystectomy, and 3/8 cases with duodenal ulcer. No statistically significant differences were found between the prevalence of DGR in cases with acute cholecystitis and those with chronic cholecystitis or other nonacute cholecystitis diagnostic categories. Although acute cholecystitis is a condition frequently associated with DGR, such reflux is a nonspecific finding and should not be considered as a secondary sign of acute cholecystitis when interpreting hepatobiliary scans.</p>","PeriodicalId":76992,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiologic imaging","volume":"7 3-4","pages":"239-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiologic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Duodenogastric reflux (DGR) as seen on hepatobiliary scintigraphy has been reported as a useful secondary sign for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. We evaluated the association of reflux with cases of acute cholecystitis as compared to those with chronic cholecystitis or other conditions. Thirty-six of 198 patients referred for hepatobiliary imaging showed DGR (18%). Among 26 patients with acute cholecystitis, 6 (23%) had DGR as compared to 9/40 (23%) cases with chronic cholecystitis, 3/12 cases with acute pancreatitis, 4/13 cases with previous cholecystectomy, and 3/8 cases with duodenal ulcer. No statistically significant differences were found between the prevalence of DGR in cases with acute cholecystitis and those with chronic cholecystitis or other nonacute cholecystitis diagnostic categories. Although acute cholecystitis is a condition frequently associated with DGR, such reflux is a nonspecific finding and should not be considered as a secondary sign of acute cholecystitis when interpreting hepatobiliary scans.

十二指肠胃反流的显像评价:在急性胆囊炎诊断中的意义。
据报道,肝胆造影显示十二指肠胃反流(DGR)是诊断急性胆囊炎的一个有用的次要征象。我们评估了急性胆囊炎患者与慢性胆囊炎或其他疾病患者反流的关系。198例肝胆造影患者中有36例显示DGR(18%)。26例急性胆囊炎患者中,6例(23%)发生DGR,而慢性胆囊炎9/40例(23%),急性胰腺炎3/12例,既往胆囊切除术4/13例,十二指肠溃疡3/8例。急性胆囊炎患者与慢性胆囊炎或其他非急性胆囊炎诊断类别患者DGR患病率无统计学差异。虽然急性胆囊炎经常与DGR相关,但这种反流是一种非特异性发现,在解释肝胆扫描时不应将其视为急性胆囊炎的继发征象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信