Horizontal Diversity

Dominik Antonowicz, B. Cantwell, I. Froumin, Glendell Jones, S. Marginson, Rómulo Pinheiro
{"title":"Horizontal Diversity","authors":"Dominik Antonowicz, B. Cantwell, I. Froumin, Glendell Jones, S. Marginson, Rómulo Pinheiro","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198828877.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores horizontal diversity in higher education in the context of high participation systems (HPS), focusing on differences in institutional mission, form and type, and internal diversity within institutions. The chapter starts with an analysis of scholarly approaches to diversity. The dominance of the market diversity perspective (‘deregulate to create more choices’) indicates not its profound relevance to the diversity issue, but the tenacious hold of marketization narratives on the policy imagination. Competition in higher education is mostly associated with less, not more, diversity. The chapter discusses four propositions in relation to diversity in HPS, highlighting decline in the overall diversity of institutional form and mission despite growth in systems, the rise of large multi-purpose institutions as the dominant form, and increased internal institutional diversity. When HPS are rendered more competitive in government-fostered quasi-markets, horizontal distinctions of mission tend to become vertical.","PeriodicalId":434618,"journal":{"name":"High Participation Systems of Higher Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Participation Systems of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198828877.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This chapter explores horizontal diversity in higher education in the context of high participation systems (HPS), focusing on differences in institutional mission, form and type, and internal diversity within institutions. The chapter starts with an analysis of scholarly approaches to diversity. The dominance of the market diversity perspective (‘deregulate to create more choices’) indicates not its profound relevance to the diversity issue, but the tenacious hold of marketization narratives on the policy imagination. Competition in higher education is mostly associated with less, not more, diversity. The chapter discusses four propositions in relation to diversity in HPS, highlighting decline in the overall diversity of institutional form and mission despite growth in systems, the rise of large multi-purpose institutions as the dominant form, and increased internal institutional diversity. When HPS are rendered more competitive in government-fostered quasi-markets, horizontal distinctions of mission tend to become vertical.
水平的多样性
本章探讨了高等教育在高参与系统(HPS)背景下的横向多样性,重点关注机构使命、形式和类型的差异,以及机构内部的多样性。本章首先分析了研究多样性的学术方法。市场多样性观点的主导地位(“放松管制以创造更多选择”)并不表明其与多样性问题的深刻相关性,而是表明市场化叙事对政策想象的顽固控制。高等教育的竞争主要与多样性的减少而不是增加有关。本章讨论了与HPS多样性相关的四个命题,强调了尽管系统有所增长,但机构形式和使命的总体多样性却在下降,大型多用途机构作为主导形式的兴起,以及内部机构多样性的增加。当HPS在政府扶持的准市场中变得更具竞争力时,横向的使命区分就会变得垂直。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信