Evaluation of the timing properties of two control networks: CAN and PROFIBUS

M.M. Santos, M. Stemmer, F. Vasques
{"title":"Evaluation of the timing properties of two control networks: CAN and PROFIBUS","authors":"M.M. Santos, M. Stemmer, F. Vasques","doi":"10.1109/ISIE.2003.1267936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the increased availability of low cost network technology, the use of networks to interconnect sensors, actuators and controllers is becoming widely accepted for the implementation of feedback control systems. Such type of feedback implementation, wherein the control loops are closed through a real-time network, are called network controlled systems (NCS). When implementing a NCS, the underlying communication network must provide a timely communication service, which must be adequate to fulfill the control application requirements. Therefore, the assessment of the network responsiveness to the real-time requirements of the control application is a fundamental issue. Both PROFIBUS and CAN networks are usually considered suitable to support small-scale NCS, due to their real-time capabilities. However their temporal responsiveness is highly dependent on both the timing characteristics of the supported message streams, such as its periodicity and the related message lengths. In this paper, we compare the timing properties of both CAN and PROFIBUS control networks. Basically, we assess their capability to support network controlled systems, through the evaluation of the related worst-case message's response time. A small example of a NCS is then used to assess the capability of the CAN control network to fulfill control application requirements.","PeriodicalId":166431,"journal":{"name":"2003 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics ( Cat. No.03TH8692)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics ( Cat. No.03TH8692)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2003.1267936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Due to the increased availability of low cost network technology, the use of networks to interconnect sensors, actuators and controllers is becoming widely accepted for the implementation of feedback control systems. Such type of feedback implementation, wherein the control loops are closed through a real-time network, are called network controlled systems (NCS). When implementing a NCS, the underlying communication network must provide a timely communication service, which must be adequate to fulfill the control application requirements. Therefore, the assessment of the network responsiveness to the real-time requirements of the control application is a fundamental issue. Both PROFIBUS and CAN networks are usually considered suitable to support small-scale NCS, due to their real-time capabilities. However their temporal responsiveness is highly dependent on both the timing characteristics of the supported message streams, such as its periodicity and the related message lengths. In this paper, we compare the timing properties of both CAN and PROFIBUS control networks. Basically, we assess their capability to support network controlled systems, through the evaluation of the related worst-case message's response time. A small example of a NCS is then used to assess the capability of the CAN control network to fulfill control application requirements.
CAN和PROFIBUS两种控制网络的时序特性评价
由于低成本网络技术的可用性增加,使用网络互连传感器,执行器和控制器正被广泛接受用于实施反馈控制系统。这种类型的反馈实现,其中控制回路通过实时网络关闭,被称为网络控制系统(NCS)。在实现NCS时,底层通信网络必须提供及时的通信服务,该服务必须足以满足控制应用的要求。因此,评估网络对控制应用程序实时需求的响应性是一个基本问题。由于具有实时性,PROFIBUS和CAN网络通常被认为适合支持小规模的NCS。然而,它们的时间响应性高度依赖于所支持的消息流的定时特征,例如其周期性和相关的消息长度。在本文中,我们比较了CAN和PROFIBUS控制网络的时序特性。基本上,我们通过评估相关最坏情况消息的响应时间来评估它们支持网络控制系统的能力。然后使用一个小的NCS示例来评估CAN控制网络满足控制应用需求的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信