Correction methods for random coincidences in 3D wholebody PET imaging

D. Brasse, Paul Kinahan, C. Lartizien, C. Corntat, M. Casey, C. Michel, T. Bruckbauer
{"title":"Correction methods for random coincidences in 3D wholebody PET imaging","authors":"D. Brasse, Paul Kinahan, C. Lartizien, C. Corntat, M. Casey, C. Michel, T. Bruckbauer","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.2001.1009234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advantages of the increased sensitivity of 3D PET imaging for wholebody imaging come the challenges of more complicated quantitative corrections, and in particular an increase in the random coincidence field of view (FOV) relative to the true coincidence FOV. The most common method of correcting for random coincidences is the on-line subtraction of a delayed coincidence channel, which does not add bias but increases noise. An alternative approach is the post-acquisition subtraction of a low noise random coincidence estimate, which can be from a smoothed delayed coincidence channel, a calibration scan, or directly estimated. Each method makes different tradeoffs between noise amplification, bias, and data processing requirements. These tradeoffs are dependent on activity injected, the local imaging environment (e.g. near the bladder), and the reconstruction algorithm. Using 3D wholebody simulations and phantom studies, we show that the gains in sinogram NEC by using a noiseless random coincidence estimation method are translated to improvements in image SNR. The image SNR, however, depends on the image reconstruction method and the local imaging environment. For 3D wholebody imaging, a low noise estimate of random coincidences based on the single photon rates improves sinogram and image SNRs by approximately 15% compared to on-line subtraction of delayed coincidences, and performs only slightly worse than using a 3D extension of the Casey-Hoffman smoothing of a separately acquired delayed coincidence sinogram.","PeriodicalId":159123,"journal":{"name":"2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2001.1009234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

With the advantages of the increased sensitivity of 3D PET imaging for wholebody imaging come the challenges of more complicated quantitative corrections, and in particular an increase in the random coincidence field of view (FOV) relative to the true coincidence FOV. The most common method of correcting for random coincidences is the on-line subtraction of a delayed coincidence channel, which does not add bias but increases noise. An alternative approach is the post-acquisition subtraction of a low noise random coincidence estimate, which can be from a smoothed delayed coincidence channel, a calibration scan, or directly estimated. Each method makes different tradeoffs between noise amplification, bias, and data processing requirements. These tradeoffs are dependent on activity injected, the local imaging environment (e.g. near the bladder), and the reconstruction algorithm. Using 3D wholebody simulations and phantom studies, we show that the gains in sinogram NEC by using a noiseless random coincidence estimation method are translated to improvements in image SNR. The image SNR, however, depends on the image reconstruction method and the local imaging environment. For 3D wholebody imaging, a low noise estimate of random coincidences based on the single photon rates improves sinogram and image SNRs by approximately 15% compared to on-line subtraction of delayed coincidences, and performs only slightly worse than using a 3D extension of the Casey-Hoffman smoothing of a separately acquired delayed coincidence sinogram.
三维全身PET成像随机重合校正方法
随着三维PET成像对全身成像灵敏度的提高,随之而来的是更复杂的定量校正的挑战,特别是相对于真实符合视场的随机符合视场(FOV)的增加。最常见的校正随机巧合的方法是延迟巧合信道的在线减法,这不会增加偏置,但会增加噪声。另一种方法是采集后减去低噪声随机符合估计,它可以来自平滑延迟符合信道,校准扫描或直接估计。每种方法在噪声放大、偏置和数据处理要求之间进行了不同的权衡。这些权衡取决于注入的活动,局部成像环境(例如膀胱附近)和重建算法。通过3D全身模拟和模拟研究,我们发现使用无噪声随机重合估计方法在正弦图NEC中获得的增益转化为图像信噪比的提高。然而,图像的信噪比取决于图像重建方法和局部成像环境。对于3D全身成像,基于单光子速率的随机重合的低噪声估计与延迟重合的在线减法相比,将sinogram和image SNRs提高了约15%,并且仅比使用单独获得的延迟重合sinogram的Casey-Hoffman平滑的3D扩展稍微差一些。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信