The Effect of Mind Mapping and Semantic Mapping on Reading Comprehension of the Eleventh Graders of Senior High School

Erika Sinambela, Immanuel Padang, A. Pasaribu
{"title":"The Effect of Mind Mapping and Semantic Mapping on Reading Comprehension of the Eleventh Graders of Senior High School","authors":"Erika Sinambela, Immanuel Padang, A. Pasaribu","doi":"10.24256/ideas.v10i2.3060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the effect of Mind Mapping and Semantic Mapping techniques on students’ reading comprehension. This research was an experimental quantitative study involving three classes, they were experimental class 1, experimental class 2 and control class. In the experimental classes, the writer applied the Mind Mapping technique and the Semantic Mapping technique while in the control class the method did not apply. The population of this research was students from class XI of Methodist Berastagi. The writer used 105 students as samples; this research sample was taken using random sampling technique. It were about 35 from XI-A class and 35 from XI-B class as experimental class and 35 from XI-C class as control class. To obtain data, the author used a reading test, as an instrument in data collection. This test consisted of two types, namely pre-test and post-test. Based on ANOVA testing P= 0.52 > 0.05 or F count = 7.65 > F table = 2 significantly affected. It can be concluded that the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted while the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected. Therefore, it can be concluded that Mind Mapping and Semantic Mapping significantly affect the achievement on students’ reading comprehension in narrative text. Based on the explanation above, the writer can choose these techniques as alternatives in learning.","PeriodicalId":427899,"journal":{"name":"IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i2.3060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses the effect of Mind Mapping and Semantic Mapping techniques on students’ reading comprehension. This research was an experimental quantitative study involving three classes, they were experimental class 1, experimental class 2 and control class. In the experimental classes, the writer applied the Mind Mapping technique and the Semantic Mapping technique while in the control class the method did not apply. The population of this research was students from class XI of Methodist Berastagi. The writer used 105 students as samples; this research sample was taken using random sampling technique. It were about 35 from XI-A class and 35 from XI-B class as experimental class and 35 from XI-C class as control class. To obtain data, the author used a reading test, as an instrument in data collection. This test consisted of two types, namely pre-test and post-test. Based on ANOVA testing P= 0.52 > 0.05 or F count = 7.65 > F table = 2 significantly affected. It can be concluded that the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted while the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected. Therefore, it can be concluded that Mind Mapping and Semantic Mapping significantly affect the achievement on students’ reading comprehension in narrative text. Based on the explanation above, the writer can choose these techniques as alternatives in learning.
思维导图和语义导图对高一学生阅读理解的影响
本文讨论了思维导图和语义导图对学生阅读理解的影响。本研究为实验性定量研究,涉及实验1班、实验2班和对照班三个班。在实验班中,作者使用了思维导图和语义映射技术,而在控制班中则没有使用这种方法。本研究的对象是卫理公会学院11班的学生。作者以105名学生为样本;本研究样本采用随机抽样方法。为了获得数据,作者使用了阅读测试作为数据收集的工具。该测试分为前测和后测两种类型。经方差分析检验P= 0.52 > 0.05或F计数= 7.65 > F表= 2显著影响。可以得出结论,备择假设(Ha)被接受,零假设(Ho)被拒绝。由此可见,思维导图和语义导图对学生叙事语篇的阅读理解成绩有显著影响。基于以上的解释,作者可以选择这些技术作为学习的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信