CASUS OF "FLAWLESS" AJAX: THE EXISTENTIAL PROBLEM OF "ACTION" IN THE TREATMENT OF ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY

N. Misyurov
{"title":"CASUS OF \"FLAWLESS\" AJAX: THE EXISTENTIAL PROBLEM OF \"ACTION\" IN THE TREATMENT OF ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY","authors":"N. Misyurov","doi":"10.35634/2412-9550-2022-32-3-221-227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existential problem of \"action\" (conscious, as well as, according to the Aristotelian classification, committed \"not of one's own free will\", \"out of ignorance\") is considered. The discursive \"texts\" illustrating the \"semantic content\" of the ancient rationalist philosophical paradigm of the times of the Athenian polis democracy, the dominant place in which belongs to man, defined as \"the measure of all things\", are analyzed. It is stated that this question - as part of the human problem - is conceptual for the modern philosophical paradigm of postmodernism (in the epistemological context of \"non-classical rationality\"). It is proved that the existential nature of the designated \"vital\" task (as well as the corresponding socio-philosophical \"procedure\" of the presentation) suggests a certain similarity between the classical and existentialist ways of solving it. It is concluded that the phenomenon of personality (as well as the related problem of \"individuality\") is due to the prerogative of a person to \"action\" in order to overcome his metaphysical non-freedom.","PeriodicalId":280577,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9550-2022-32-3-221-227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existential problem of "action" (conscious, as well as, according to the Aristotelian classification, committed "not of one's own free will", "out of ignorance") is considered. The discursive "texts" illustrating the "semantic content" of the ancient rationalist philosophical paradigm of the times of the Athenian polis democracy, the dominant place in which belongs to man, defined as "the measure of all things", are analyzed. It is stated that this question - as part of the human problem - is conceptual for the modern philosophical paradigm of postmodernism (in the epistemological context of "non-classical rationality"). It is proved that the existential nature of the designated "vital" task (as well as the corresponding socio-philosophical "procedure" of the presentation) suggests a certain similarity between the classical and existentialist ways of solving it. It is concluded that the phenomenon of personality (as well as the related problem of "individuality") is due to the prerogative of a person to "action" in order to overcome his metaphysical non-freedom.
“完美”阿贾克斯的成因:古代哲学处理中的“行动”存在问题
“行动”的存在问题(有意识的,以及根据亚里士多德的分类,“不是出于自己的自由意志”,“出于无知”)被考虑。分析了雅典城邦民主时代的古代理性主义哲学范式的话语“文本”的“语义内容”,民主的主导地位属于人,被定义为“万物的尺度”。作为人类问题的一部分,这个问题对于后现代主义的现代哲学范式(在“非经典理性”的认识论背景下)来说是概念性的。本文证明,指定的“重要”任务的存在性(以及相应的社会哲学呈现“程序”)表明古典和存在主义解决它的方法之间存在着一定的相似性。结论认为,人格现象(以及与之相关的“个体性”问题)是由于人为了克服其形而上的非自由而具有“行动”的特权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信