The effects of Dried Guava Waste and Dried Olive Cake as Substitutes for Alfalfa on Rabbit Farm Profit

Noha M. Wahed, S. Attalah, R. Darwish, M. Fouda
{"title":"The effects of Dried Guava Waste and Dried Olive Cake as Substitutes for Alfalfa on Rabbit Farm Profit","authors":"Noha M. Wahed, S. Attalah, R. Darwish, M. Fouda","doi":"10.35943/mvmj.2019.20.403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the effects of adding dried guava waste and dried olive cake as substitution of alfalfa in diet on rabbit farm profits.\nDesign: Randomized controlled experimental study.\nAnimals: Thirty-six Hypluse white rabbits at the age of 33 days with an average body weight of 696.6 g.\nProcedures: Rabbits were allocated into four groups of nine animals each. Group 1 (Control group) was fed on a basal rabbit diet. Group 2 was fed on a diet containing 5% dried guava waste (DGW) as a substitute for alfalfa, Group 3 which was fed on a diet containing 5% dried olive cake (DOC) as a substitute for alfalfa, and Group 4 which received a diet containing combination of both 5% DGW and 5% DOC as a substitute for alfalfa. \nResults: The addition of 5% DGW and 5% DOC in diets of rabbits as a substitute for alfalfa resulted in improvements in body weights of animals when compared to the basal diets, whereas the inclusion of the two materials in the diet of rabbits lowered the body weights of animals. The feed intake in group (two and three) was lower than that of the control group. Groups (two and three) showed lower values of feed costs, total variable costs and higher total return, and thus had higher values of profits when compared to the control group. Group four showed higher total variable costs and total costs, while the total return was the lowest and consequently the profit was the lowest also. \nConclusion and clinical relevance: The addition of either 5% DGW or DOC in diets of rabbits to substitute a portion of alfalfa appeared satisfactory for rabbit farm profit as their profit were higher than control group by 5.37 and 11.74 LE respectively, while their combination did not appear to be useful and therefore was not recommended.","PeriodicalId":330550,"journal":{"name":"DECEMBER 2019","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECEMBER 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35943/mvmj.2019.20.403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of adding dried guava waste and dried olive cake as substitution of alfalfa in diet on rabbit farm profits. Design: Randomized controlled experimental study. Animals: Thirty-six Hypluse white rabbits at the age of 33 days with an average body weight of 696.6 g. Procedures: Rabbits were allocated into four groups of nine animals each. Group 1 (Control group) was fed on a basal rabbit diet. Group 2 was fed on a diet containing 5% dried guava waste (DGW) as a substitute for alfalfa, Group 3 which was fed on a diet containing 5% dried olive cake (DOC) as a substitute for alfalfa, and Group 4 which received a diet containing combination of both 5% DGW and 5% DOC as a substitute for alfalfa. Results: The addition of 5% DGW and 5% DOC in diets of rabbits as a substitute for alfalfa resulted in improvements in body weights of animals when compared to the basal diets, whereas the inclusion of the two materials in the diet of rabbits lowered the body weights of animals. The feed intake in group (two and three) was lower than that of the control group. Groups (two and three) showed lower values of feed costs, total variable costs and higher total return, and thus had higher values of profits when compared to the control group. Group four showed higher total variable costs and total costs, while the total return was the lowest and consequently the profit was the lowest also. Conclusion and clinical relevance: The addition of either 5% DGW or DOC in diets of rabbits to substitute a portion of alfalfa appeared satisfactory for rabbit farm profit as their profit were higher than control group by 5.37 and 11.74 LE respectively, while their combination did not appear to be useful and therefore was not recommended.
番石榴干渣和干橄榄饼替代苜蓿对兔场利润的影响
目的:评价在日粮中添加番石榴干渣和干橄榄饼替代苜蓿对兔养殖场效益的影响。设计:随机对照实验研究。实验动物:36只33日龄杂交白兔,平均体重696.6 g。实验步骤:将家兔分为四组,每组9只。1组(对照组)饲喂基础家兔饲粮。2组饲喂以5%番石榴干渣(DGW)替代苜蓿的饲粮,3组饲喂以5%干橄榄饼(DOC)替代苜蓿的饲粮,4组饲喂以5%干橄榄饼和5%干橄榄饼混合的饲粮替代苜蓿。结果:与基础饲粮相比,在家兔饲粮中添加5% DGW和5% DOC替代苜蓿可改善动物体重,而在家兔饲粮中添加这两种材料则会降低动物体重。2、3组采食量均低于对照组。与对照组相比,2组和3组的饲料成本、总可变成本值较低,总回报较高,因此利润值较高。第四组的总可变成本和总成本较高,而总收益最低,因此利润也最低。结论及临床意义:在家兔饲粮中添加5% DGW或DOC替代部分苜蓿,其利润分别比对照组高5.37和11.74 LE,对兔场利润满意,但两者的组合似乎没有效果,因此不推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信