IRAN’S ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN POLICY: GEOPOLITICAL REALITIES AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Emin Şihali̇yev
{"title":"IRAN’S ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN POLICY: GEOPOLITICAL REALITIES AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS","authors":"Emin Şihali̇yev","doi":"10.53718/gttad.1265068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT \nThe Second Karabakh War that led to Armenia’s defeat as a result of Azerbaijan’s victorious counter-offensive dubbed as “Iron Fist” was not just a war fought between the two countries, but also a deciding factor of the new geo-political situation in the South Caucasus region. It is beyond a doubt that there are countries reluctant to accept these new geo-political realities that are trying to destabilize the situation and Iran is one of these states. Despite the Azer¬baijani people’s being part of the Islamic civilization and the country’s historical and cultural proximity to Iran, the Iranian state has placed an emphasis on gaining significant leverage of influence in the region, prioritizing Armenia in its quest for a strategic ally. Moreover, on many occasions, Iran has backed Armenian military aggression against Azerbaijan either openly or covertly. Azerbaijan has sought to comply with the principles of good neighborliness, considering the current geo-political situation, instead of taking a tough stance against Iran. At the same time, Azerbaijan has established bilateral political, economic and cultural ties with Iran. Nevertheless, Iran moved to expand its relations with Armenia, keeping in mind its concerns over “the Azerbaijan Republic’s unification with the territories in northern Iran densely populated by Turkish”. From Iran’s viewpoint, Armenia fulfills the emerging task of protecting western and northern Iran from the influence of the Turks. On the other hand, capitalizing on the Armenian community’s political clout in the United States and Europe meets Iran’s interests. As for Armenia’s reasoning, it considers Iran as a country capable of revitalizing its economy and its approach to bilateral relations remains unchanged. Other factors contributing to the strengthened Iranian-Armenian relations included Turkey’s growing geopolitical influence in the region, and Azerbaijan’s close relations with Turkey. Although new geo-political realities emerged in the South Caucasus region during and after the 44-day war, Iran has been attempting to destabilize the situation ever since due to its reluctance to accept the facts. Unsurprisingly, ample evidence is available concerning Iran's cooperation with both Armenia and the separatist entity, as well as its involvement in joint illegal activities in the Azerbaijani territories that were under Armenian occupation for nearly 30 years. Azerbaijan liberated its territory from the Armenian occupation as a result of the 44-day Patriotic War, which led to the emergence of new geo-political realities in the South Caucasus. Evidently, Iran is utterly perturbed over this situation, given that the new geo-political environment inceases the influence of Azerbaijan and Turkey in the region as part of their cooperation. Furthermore, the strengthening of a strategic alliance between Turkey and Azerbaijan and the expanding cooperation and integration in the Turkic world in general come into play. Overall, Turkic unity is an underlying cause of Iran's inability to grasp the current geo-political realities in the region. Iran definitely perceives Turkic unity as a threat. Therefore, it has consistently backed Armenia instead of supporting Azerbaijan, and this is currently the case as well. Although Iran certainly reserves a sovereign right to pursue its own policy and establish close ties with Armenia, taking sides, supporting this country and making defiant accusations significantly questions Iran’s attitude of good neighborliness toward Azerbaijan.","PeriodicalId":150594,"journal":{"name":"Genel Türk Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genel Türk Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53718/gttad.1265068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Second Karabakh War that led to Armenia’s defeat as a result of Azerbaijan’s victorious counter-offensive dubbed as “Iron Fist” was not just a war fought between the two countries, but also a deciding factor of the new geo-political situation in the South Caucasus region. It is beyond a doubt that there are countries reluctant to accept these new geo-political realities that are trying to destabilize the situation and Iran is one of these states. Despite the Azer¬baijani people’s being part of the Islamic civilization and the country’s historical and cultural proximity to Iran, the Iranian state has placed an emphasis on gaining significant leverage of influence in the region, prioritizing Armenia in its quest for a strategic ally. Moreover, on many occasions, Iran has backed Armenian military aggression against Azerbaijan either openly or covertly. Azerbaijan has sought to comply with the principles of good neighborliness, considering the current geo-political situation, instead of taking a tough stance against Iran. At the same time, Azerbaijan has established bilateral political, economic and cultural ties with Iran. Nevertheless, Iran moved to expand its relations with Armenia, keeping in mind its concerns over “the Azerbaijan Republic’s unification with the territories in northern Iran densely populated by Turkish”. From Iran’s viewpoint, Armenia fulfills the emerging task of protecting western and northern Iran from the influence of the Turks. On the other hand, capitalizing on the Armenian community’s political clout in the United States and Europe meets Iran’s interests. As for Armenia’s reasoning, it considers Iran as a country capable of revitalizing its economy and its approach to bilateral relations remains unchanged. Other factors contributing to the strengthened Iranian-Armenian relations included Turkey’s growing geopolitical influence in the region, and Azerbaijan’s close relations with Turkey. Although new geo-political realities emerged in the South Caucasus region during and after the 44-day war, Iran has been attempting to destabilize the situation ever since due to its reluctance to accept the facts. Unsurprisingly, ample evidence is available concerning Iran's cooperation with both Armenia and the separatist entity, as well as its involvement in joint illegal activities in the Azerbaijani territories that were under Armenian occupation for nearly 30 years. Azerbaijan liberated its territory from the Armenian occupation as a result of the 44-day Patriotic War, which led to the emergence of new geo-political realities in the South Caucasus. Evidently, Iran is utterly perturbed over this situation, given that the new geo-political environment inceases the influence of Azerbaijan and Turkey in the region as part of their cooperation. Furthermore, the strengthening of a strategic alliance between Turkey and Azerbaijan and the expanding cooperation and integration in the Turkic world in general come into play. Overall, Turkic unity is an underlying cause of Iran's inability to grasp the current geo-political realities in the region. Iran definitely perceives Turkic unity as a threat. Therefore, it has consistently backed Armenia instead of supporting Azerbaijan, and this is currently the case as well. Although Iran certainly reserves a sovereign right to pursue its own policy and establish close ties with Armenia, taking sides, supporting this country and making defiant accusations significantly questions Iran’s attitude of good neighborliness toward Azerbaijan.
伊朗对亚美尼亚和阿塞拜疆的政策:地缘政治现实与比较分析
第二次卡拉巴赫战争由于阿塞拜疆被称为“铁拳”的反攻胜利而导致亚美尼亚战败,这不仅是两国之间的战争,也是南高加索地区新地缘政治局势的决定性因素。毫无疑问,有些国家不愿意接受这些新的地缘政治现实,试图破坏局势的稳定,伊朗就是其中之一。尽管阿塞拜疆人民是伊斯兰文明的一部分,而且该国在历史和文化上与伊朗接近,但伊朗政府一直强调在该地区获得重要的影响力,在寻求战略盟友时优先考虑亚美尼亚。此外,伊朗在许多场合公开或秘密地支持亚美尼亚对阿塞拜疆的军事侵略。考虑到目前的地缘政治局势,阿塞拜疆寻求遵守睦邻友好原则,而不是对伊朗采取强硬立场。与此同时,阿塞拜疆与伊朗建立了双边政治、经济和文化联系。然而,伊朗考虑到它对“阿塞拜疆共和国与土耳其人密集居住的伊朗北部领土统一”的关切,开始扩大与亚美尼亚的关系。从伊朗的角度来看,亚美尼亚履行了保护伊朗西部和北部免受土耳其人影响的新任务。另一方面,利用亚美尼亚社区在美国和欧洲的政治影响力符合伊朗的利益。至于亚美尼亚的理由,它认为伊朗是一个有能力振兴其经济的国家,它对双边关系的态度没有改变。促进伊朗-亚美尼亚关系加强的其他因素包括土耳其在该地区日益增长的地缘政治影响以及阿塞拜疆与土耳其的密切关系。尽管在44天的战争期间和之后,南高加索地区出现了新的地缘政治现实,但由于伊朗不愿接受这一事实,它一直试图破坏局势的稳定。毫不奇怪,有充分证据表明伊朗同亚美尼亚和分离主义实体合作,并在亚美尼亚占领了近30年的阿塞拜疆领土上参与联合非法活动。由于44天的卫国战争,阿塞拜疆从亚美尼亚占领下解放了其领土,这场战争导致南高加索出现了新的地缘政治现实。显然,伊朗对这一局势深感不安,因为新的地缘政治环境增加了阿塞拜疆和土耳其在该地区的影响力,这是两国合作的一部分。此外,加强土耳其和阿塞拜疆之间的战略联盟以及在整个突厥世界扩大合作和一体化也在发挥作用。总的来说,突厥人的团结是伊朗无法把握该地区当前地缘政治现实的根本原因。伊朗肯定认为突厥人的团结是一种威胁。因此,它一贯支持亚美尼亚,而不是支持阿塞拜疆,目前也是如此。虽然伊朗当然保留奉行自己政策的主权权利,并与亚美尼亚建立密切关系,但偏袒、支持亚美尼亚、挑衅性指责,都严重质疑伊朗对阿塞拜疆睦邻友好的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信