Energy efficiency limits of logic and memory

S. Agarwal, Jeanine E. Cook, E. Debenedictis, M. Frank, G. Cauwenberghs, S. Srikanth, Bobin Deng, Eric R. Hein, Paul G. Rabbat, T. Conte
{"title":"Energy efficiency limits of logic and memory","authors":"S. Agarwal, Jeanine E. Cook, E. Debenedictis, M. Frank, G. Cauwenberghs, S. Srikanth, Bobin Deng, Eric R. Hein, Paul G. Rabbat, T. Conte","doi":"10.1109/ICRC.2016.7738676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We address practical limits of energy efficiency scaling for logic and memory. Scaling of logic will end with unreliable operation, making computers probabilistic as a side effect. The errors can be corrected or tolerated, but overhead will increase with further scaling. We address the tradeoff between scaling and error correction that yields minimum energy per operation, finding new error correction methods with energy consumption limits about 2× below current approaches. The maximum energy efficiency for memory depends on several other factors. Adiabatic and reversible methods applied to logic have promise, but overheads have precluded practical use. However, the regular array structure of memory arrays tends to reduce overhead and makes adiabatic memory a viable option. This paper reports an adiabatic memory that has been tested at about 85× improvement over standard designs for energy efficiency. Combining these approaches could set energy efficiency expectations for processor-in-memory computing systems.","PeriodicalId":387008,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Rebooting Computing (ICRC)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Rebooting Computing (ICRC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRC.2016.7738676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We address practical limits of energy efficiency scaling for logic and memory. Scaling of logic will end with unreliable operation, making computers probabilistic as a side effect. The errors can be corrected or tolerated, but overhead will increase with further scaling. We address the tradeoff between scaling and error correction that yields minimum energy per operation, finding new error correction methods with energy consumption limits about 2× below current approaches. The maximum energy efficiency for memory depends on several other factors. Adiabatic and reversible methods applied to logic have promise, but overheads have precluded practical use. However, the regular array structure of memory arrays tends to reduce overhead and makes adiabatic memory a viable option. This paper reports an adiabatic memory that has been tested at about 85× improvement over standard designs for energy efficiency. Combining these approaches could set energy efficiency expectations for processor-in-memory computing systems.
逻辑和内存的能效限制
我们解决了逻辑和内存的能源效率缩放的实际限制。逻辑的缩放将以不可靠的操作告终,使计算机成为概率化的副作用。这些错误可以被纠正或容忍,但是开销会随着扩展而增加。我们解决了缩放和误差校正之间的权衡,每次操作产生的能量最小,找到了新的误差校正方法,其能耗限制约为当前方法的2倍。存储器的最大能量效率取决于其他几个因素。应用于逻辑的绝热和可逆方法有希望,但开销阻碍了实际应用。然而,内存数组的常规数组结构倾向于减少开销,并使绝热内存成为可行的选择。本文报道了一种绝热存储器,经过测试,其能效比标准设计提高了约85倍。结合这些方法可以为内存中的处理器计算系统设定能效预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信