Effect of Cassava Processing Effluent on Microbial Diversity and Physicochemical Constituents of Soils

{"title":"Effect of Cassava Processing Effluent on Microbial Diversity and Physicochemical Constituents of Soils","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jahr.04.03.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the effect of cassava processing effluent on the microbiological and physicochemical constituents of soils at Luyor Gwara in Khana, River State, Nigeria. The parameters of concern were investigated using standard analytical techniques. Bacterial and fungal counts were reported as colony forming units (CFU) and spore forming units (SFU) respectively. Mean values of total heterotrophic bacterial and fungal count of the polluted soils ranged from 1.18 × 107CFU/g to 1.90 × 107CFU/g and from 1.4 × 106 SFU/g to 7.0 × 106 SFU/g respectively. While bacterial and fungal counts in the control soil ranged from 3.0 × 106CFU/g to 4.0 × 106CFU/g and 1.0 × 106 SFU/g to 3.0 × 106 SFU/g respectively. Except for station C that had lower fungal counts, the bacterial and fungal counts were higher in polluted soils than in control soils. There was statistical significant difference in the total heterotrophic bacterial and fungal count at p≤0.05. The bacteria frequencies were Staphylococcus aureus (20.58%), Bacillus spp (17.64%), Escherichia coli (14.7%), Corynebacterium spp (11.8%), Lactobacillus spp (8.82%), Pseudomonas spp (8.82%), Alcaligenes faecalis (8.82%), Klebsiella spp (5.88%), and Kurthia spp (2.94%). While fungi were Aspergillus niger (30%), Penicillium spp (20%), Microsporium canis (15%), Fusarium spp (10%), Mucor spp (10%), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (10%), and Epidermophyton floccosum (5%). The soil temperatures ranged from 27.8 to 25.4ºC, pH from 6.99 to 7.84, Electrical conductivity from 172 to 60μs/cm, Sulphate ranged from 184 to 34.5mg/kg, Nitrate from 61.77 to 31.10mg/kg, Phosphate from 10.5 to 2.1mg/kg, and total Organic Carbon ranged from 0.51 to 0.045%. Generally, physicochemical constituents were higher in the cassava effluent polluted soils than in the control. The cassava effluent however impacted negatively on the soil microbial populations and diversity which will sure affect the soil ecology and fertility. The presence of potential pathogens poses serious health hazard by disease associated with these organisms.","PeriodicalId":290736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture and Horticulture Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture and Horticulture Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jahr.04.03.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of cassava processing effluent on the microbiological and physicochemical constituents of soils at Luyor Gwara in Khana, River State, Nigeria. The parameters of concern were investigated using standard analytical techniques. Bacterial and fungal counts were reported as colony forming units (CFU) and spore forming units (SFU) respectively. Mean values of total heterotrophic bacterial and fungal count of the polluted soils ranged from 1.18 × 107CFU/g to 1.90 × 107CFU/g and from 1.4 × 106 SFU/g to 7.0 × 106 SFU/g respectively. While bacterial and fungal counts in the control soil ranged from 3.0 × 106CFU/g to 4.0 × 106CFU/g and 1.0 × 106 SFU/g to 3.0 × 106 SFU/g respectively. Except for station C that had lower fungal counts, the bacterial and fungal counts were higher in polluted soils than in control soils. There was statistical significant difference in the total heterotrophic bacterial and fungal count at p≤0.05. The bacteria frequencies were Staphylococcus aureus (20.58%), Bacillus spp (17.64%), Escherichia coli (14.7%), Corynebacterium spp (11.8%), Lactobacillus spp (8.82%), Pseudomonas spp (8.82%), Alcaligenes faecalis (8.82%), Klebsiella spp (5.88%), and Kurthia spp (2.94%). While fungi were Aspergillus niger (30%), Penicillium spp (20%), Microsporium canis (15%), Fusarium spp (10%), Mucor spp (10%), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (10%), and Epidermophyton floccosum (5%). The soil temperatures ranged from 27.8 to 25.4ºC, pH from 6.99 to 7.84, Electrical conductivity from 172 to 60μs/cm, Sulphate ranged from 184 to 34.5mg/kg, Nitrate from 61.77 to 31.10mg/kg, Phosphate from 10.5 to 2.1mg/kg, and total Organic Carbon ranged from 0.51 to 0.045%. Generally, physicochemical constituents were higher in the cassava effluent polluted soils than in the control. The cassava effluent however impacted negatively on the soil microbial populations and diversity which will sure affect the soil ecology and fertility. The presence of potential pathogens poses serious health hazard by disease associated with these organisms.
木薯加工废水对土壤微生物多样性和理化成分的影响
本文研究了木薯加工废水对尼日利亚河州卡纳Luyor Gwara土壤微生物和理化成分的影响。采用标准分析技术对相关参数进行了研究。细菌和真菌计数分别为菌落形成单位(CFU)和孢子形成单位(SFU)。污染土壤中异养细菌总数平均值为1.18 ~ 1.90 × 107CFU/g,真菌总数平均值为1.4 ~ 7.0 × 106 SFU/g。对照土壤细菌和真菌数量分别为3.0 × 106CFU/g ~ 4.0 × 106CFU/g和1.0 × 106 SFU/g ~ 3.0 × 106 SFU/g。除C站真菌计数较低外,污染土壤的细菌和真菌计数均高于对照土壤。两组间异养细菌和真菌总数差异有统计学意义(p≤0.05)。细菌频次为金黄色葡萄球菌(20.58%)、芽孢杆菌(17.64%)、大肠杆菌(14.7%)、杆状杆菌(11.8%)、乳酸菌(8.82%)、假单胞菌(8.82%)、粪钙菌(8.82%)、克雷伯氏菌(5.88%)、克氏菌(2.94%)。真菌为黑曲霉(30%)、青霉(20%)、犬小孢子菌(15%)、镰刀菌(10%)、毛霉(10%)、酿酒酵母菌(10%)、絮状表皮菌(5%)。土壤温度为27.8 ~ 25.4℃,pH值为6.99 ~ 7.84,电导率为172 ~ 60μs/cm,硫酸盐为184 ~ 34.5mg/kg,硝酸盐为61.77 ~ 31.10mg/kg,磷酸盐为10.5 ~ 2.1mg/kg,总有机碳为0.51 ~ 0.045%。总的来说,木薯废水污染土壤的理化成分高于对照。然而,木薯废水对土壤微生物种群和多样性产生了负面影响,从而影响土壤生态和肥力。潜在病原体的存在由于与这些生物体有关的疾病而造成严重的健康危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信